5.1.2
System Operational Concept. A System Operational Concept of the RAS systems that
details the capability and functionality under defined operating and emergency
conditions. The System Operational Concept is to be agreed between the designers and
Owners and is to include as applicable:
-
Required class
notations.
-
Details of intended
supplying and receiving ships.
-
Description of
each RAS operation and combination of equipment required.
-
Plans showing
each proposed combination of equipment, fully rigged.
-
Details of solids
that may be received or supplied (maximum size and weight together
with UN hazard category if applicable) together with transfer rates.
-
Details of liquids
that may be received or supplied, (including flash point of oils and
transfer rates).
-
Details of the
range of ship's speeds, sea and environmental conditions under which
each RAS operation may be undertaken.
-
Interoperability
capability.
-
Manning requirements.
-
Details of arrangements
for RAS operations in darkness.
-
Details of hose
clearing/drainage arrangements after RAS operations have been completed, see
Vol 3, Pt 1, Ch 5, 9.1 General 9.1.4.
5.1.3
Engineering
and safety justification. An engineering and safety justification
for the RAS systems stating design standards used, assumptions made
and any technical evidence. The justification is to:
-
State all design
standards used for the design, manufacture, installation and testing
of RAS systems and equipment.
-
Provide details
of all RAS equipment and compatibility of different items of equipment.
-
Provide evidence
that all RAS operations (equipment and combinations) at each RAS station
as identified in the design statement, can be carried out safely and
in accordance with classification and equipment manufacturer's requirements.
-
Identify safe
equipment configurations.
-
Provide calculations
that demonstrate that the structural loading is in accordance with
Rule requirements.
-
Provide calculations
that demonstrate that equipment loads are in accordance with manufacturer's
specified limits.
-
Provide evidence
that sufficient control, monitoring and communication facilities are
provided to conduct RAS operations safely and efficiently.
-
Limits are to
be defined in terms of lateral separation between vessels, ship's
speeds, wind force, sea conditions (wave height, period and direction)
and environmental conditions (visibility). The validation of potential
operational scenarios may be by using a set of generic ship types
agreed between the Owner and the designer.
-
Examine the effect
of environmental conditions (e.g. sea state, water depth, visibility,
wind strength, etc.) on the proposed RAS operations and define limiting
conditions and define limiting environmental conditions for each RAS
operation.
-
Address the specific
needs of emergency breakaway and demonstrate that such a procedure
can be undertaken with all RAS equipment configurations at each RAS
station. The recovery of equipment after an emergency breakaway is
also to be addressed.
-
Provide evidence
that the ship internal, ship to ship and ship to helicopter communications
systems will allow safe and efficient communications and RAS operations.
The communications equipment and systems provided are to take into
account the design of the ship and intended method of operation. Redundancy
is also to be considered.
-
Provide evidence
that each system is designed to minimise the risks associated with
handling the particular cargo (e.g. static electricity with aviation
fuel).
-
Address the disabling
of automatic control, protection and safety functions for machinery
and engineering systems where these are considered essential during
replenishment at sea activities. The arrangements are to be consistent
with the requirements of Vol 2, Pt 1, Ch 3, 4.9 Military requirements 4.9.4
Where applied standards are not in the public domain, e.g. ATP
16 (latest version) covering NATO Replenishment at Sea, a copy is
to be included with the engineering and safety justification.
5.1.4
General
arrangement plan. A general arrangement plan of the ship showing
the following information:
-
Position of each
RAS station, with identifiable reference to the engineering and safety
justification and System Operational Concept.
-
The tasks to be
carried out at each RAS station.
-
Position of observation
and control positions.
-
Arcs of fields
of view and operation from each of the observation and control positions
and RAS stations.
5.1.6
Fluid
transfer plans and particulars.For the receiving ship, plans
in diagrammatic form showing filling arrangements from the filling
connection to filling trunks (where installed) and subsequently to
each storage tank. The plans are to include a statement of the minimum
flash point (closed-cup test) together with the required and the maximum
transfer/filling rates. For the supplying ship, plans in diagrammatic
form showing pumping and piping arrangements from storage tanks to
the ship's discharge connection. See also
Vol 3, Pt 1, Ch 5, 9.1 General 9.1.10.
5.1.7
Lifting
appliances. Plans and details of all lifting appliances as
required by LR’s Code for Lifting Appliances in a Marine
Environment or other specified design code.
5.1.8
RAS
equipment. Details of equipment identified for RAS operations.
Design and installation loads on the equipment together with details
of securing and holding down arrangements. Details of the access required
for maintenance and to operate the equipment.
5.1.9
Operating
manuals. Operating manuals are to be provided on board and
submitted for information where requested by LR. The manuals are to
include the following information:
-
Particulars and
a description of each RAS system.
-
Operating and
maintenance instructions for all equipment.
-
Matrix of safe
combinations of equipment and details of permitted load that may be
carried by each combination.
-
Test procedures
for each system.
-
Details of valve
and pipe configurations when transferring fluids.
-
Details of arrangements
for transfer of solids and personnel.
-
Details of night
operations.
5.1.10
Testing
and trials procedures. A schedule of testing and trials to
demonstrate that systems are capable of operating as described in
the System Operational Concept. The testing and trials procedures
are to include details of through life load testing which includes
the periodicity of load testing for different items of equipment.
5.1.11 Where
an evaluation of an engineering and safety justification is required
for the propulsion and steering arrangements, see
Vol 3, Pt 1, Ch 5, 7.2 Machinery redundancy 7.2.2, the following information
is to be submitted:
-
A Failure Modes
and Effects Analysis (FMEA), see
Vol 2, Pt 1, Ch 3, 18 Risk Assessment (RA).
-
Design standards
and any assumptions made.
-
Limiting operating
parameters for ship and machinery installation.
-
A statement and
evidence in respect of the reliability of any non-duplicated components.