Section
5 Military design requirements
5.1 RAS seating and support structure
5.1.1 The
strength of seats and supporting structure is to be sufficient to
withstand the forces imposed by the equipment for all possible operating
conditions and loads from ship motions, see
Vol 1, Pt 5, Ch 3, 5.3 Pressure on internal decks, Pin. Design calculations
are to be submitted.
5.1.2 The
seating and supporting structure is to be tested in accordance with
a specified standard, see also
Vol 3, Pt 1, Ch 5, 3.1 General 3.1.4. Care is
to be taken to ensure that the test arrangements represent the actual
magnitude and direction of loads, and that the loading is applied
to all relevant parts of the supporting structure rather than local
items only.
5.1.4 A sufficient
deck area clear of projections and equipment suitably strengthened
for impact loading is to be provided for the landing of stores and
equipment.
5.2 Vehicle and equipment holding down arrangements
5.2.1 The
strength and stiffness of the holding down arrangements and the supporting
structure under is to be sufficient to withstand the forces imposed
by the vehicle(s) and or equipment for all possible operating conditions
and loads from ship motions, see
Vol 1, Pt 5, Ch 3, 5.3 Pressure on internal decks, Pin The design calculations
are to be submitted.
5.3 Masts and externally mounted sensors or equipment
5.3.1 Masts
are to be of adequate strength and stiffness for the equipment they
support. The design calculations are to be submitted.
5.3.2 Plated
mast structure is to be treated as superstructure and the structural
requirements for superstructure as defined in Table 3.3.9 Superstructure plating and Table 3.3.10 Superstructure framing in Pt 6, Ch 3 for NS1 type
vessels and Vol 1, Pt 6, Ch 3, 4.8 Superstructures, deckhouses and bulwarks 4.8.4 and Vol 1, Pt 6, Ch 3, 4.8 Superstructures, deckhouses and bulwarks 4.8.5 for NS2 and NS3 type vessels
are to be applied. Minimum requirements are given in Vol 1, Pt 6, Ch 3, 2 Minimum structural requirements and Vol 1, Pt 6, Ch 2, 2.9 Proportions of stiffener sections.
5.3.4 The
excitation of the mast by ship motions, machinery, propellers and
equipment is to be specially considered and the designers calculations
are to be submitted. Where possible the designer should avoid mast
natural frequencies within ±20 per cent of significant global
mast excitation frequencies. Where this is not possible the vibration
amplitudes should be calculated to confirm they are within acceptable
limits for the mast structure and equipment. In general, ship motions
can be estimated from Vol 1, Pt 5, Ch 3, 2 Motion response. See also
Vol 1, Pt 6, Ch 2, 4 Vibration control.
It is recommended that the frequency of the first mode of vibration
of a pole mast be not less than 3,0 Hz to prevent potential excitation
from the first vertical hull girder vibration mode in the range 1-2,5
Hz. The frequency of the first mode of vibration of a pole mast should
be a minimum of 1 Hz above the first vertical hull girder mode.
5.3.5 Structure
supporting radar or equipment critical to the operation of ship systems
is to be of adequate stiffness to maintain the alignment of the equipment
within the tolerance agreed with the manufacturer.
5.3.6 The
mast should be designed and sited such that it produces minimum interference
with the ships sensors and equipment.
5.3.7 Suitable permanent access arrangements are to be provided inside and on the
exterior of the mast for maintenance of the structure and equipment. Provision is to be
made for the drainage of water from all parts of the mast, both internal and external.
Where applicable, protective coatings are to be applied in accordance with the
requirements of Vol 1, Pt 6, Ch 6, 3.1 General. For corrosion margins, see
Vol 1, Pt 6, Ch 6, 3.8 Corrosion margin.
5.3.8 Mast
support arrangements are to be of suitable strength and stiffness
and fully integrated into the hull or superstructure. The design calculations
and arrangements are to be submitted.
5.3.9 For
equipment distributed along the length of the ship, consideration
is to be given to the global stiffness of the ships’ hull girder
in relation to the alignment tolerances required for the equipment
(increasing hull stiffness is not normally an efficient option).
5.3.10 High
powered transmitting equipment where fitted is to be considered for
the effects of electromagnetic influence on adjacent equipment and
manned spaces.
5.4 Towed arrays, towed bodies and towing points
5.4.1 The
support structure of towed systems is to be suitably integrated into
the main hull structure. Any additional primary stiffening is to be
extended for at least three frame spaces forward and aft of the equipment.
5.4.2 The
towing point and associated equipment is to be located over a primary
longitudinal girder and preferably supported by a transverse web frame.
The designers calculations are to be submitted for the supporting
structure using the 1,5 times the maximum breaking load of the cable.
5.4.3 Towed
array handling equipment is to be designed in accordance with a specified
standard. The seating of array handling equipment is to be adequately
supported.
5.5 Lifting appliances and support
arrangements
5.5.1 Lifting appliance pedestals and foundations that are welded to the
supporting hull structures are classification items, and the scantlings and arrangements
are to comply with LR's requirements whether or not LR is also requested to certify or
class the lifting appliance and issue the Register of Ship’s Lifting Appliances and
Cargo Handling Gear, see
Figure 1.5.1 Classification items and applicability of LR’s requirements for lifting
appliance pedestals and foundations.
Figure 1.5.1 Classification items and applicability of LR’s requirements for lifting
appliance pedestals and foundations
5.5.2 The scantlings of lifting appliance pedestals and foundations (such as
masts, derrick posts and crane pedestals) are to be designed in accordance with a
specified standard, with respect to the worst possible combinations of loads resulting
from the installed lifting appliance self-weight, live load and accelerations, together
with those resulting from the wind and the ship’s heel and trim, when in use and when
stowed. When submitting plans for the proposed pedestal and foundation, the design
calculations are to be included.
5.5.3 Stowage arrangements are to be taken into account when calculating the loads
applied to the pedestal.
5.5.4 Lifting appliance pedestals and foundations are to be efficiently supported
and, in general, are to be carried through the deck and satisfactorily integrated into
the surrounding structure. Alternatively, lifting appliance pedestals and foundations
may be carried into a supporting structure of adequate strength, see
Vol 1, Pt 4, Ch 1, 5.5 Lifting appliances and support arrangements 5.5.6. Proposals for other support arrangements will be specially
considered.
5.5.5 Deck plating and underdeck structure are to be reinforced under lifting
appliance pedestals and foundations, and where the deck is penetrated the deck plating
is to be suitably increased.
5.5.6 The forces and moments resulting from an installed lifting appliance are to
be taken into consideration on the basis of the lifting appliance design standard when
assessing the support arrangements, including the deck plating and underdeck stiffening
in way of the lifting appliance pedestal and foundation. The global hull girder stresses
are to be taken into account where applicable, with due consideration given to the
material grade, see also
Vol 1, Pt 6, Ch 4 Hull Girder Strength.
5.5.7 Insert plates are to be incorporated in the deck plating in way of lifting
appliance foundations. The thickness of the insert plates is to be as required by the
designer’s calculations but is in no case is to be taken as less than 1,5 times the
thickness of the adjacent attached plating.
5.5.8 All
inserts are to have well radiused corners and be suitably edge prepared
prior to welding. All welding in way is to be double continuous and
full penetration where necessary. Tapers are to be not less than three
to one.
5.5.10 Where life-saving appliance davits and cranes are used for additional military
operations, the load cases are to be specially considered and the supporting deck
structure assessed against these additional load cases. Consideration is to be given to
the possibility of fatigue arising due to high cyclic loading.
|