2.3.1 It is
clear that the most efficient method to improve the fatigue strength
of welded structural details is at the design stage. To this effect,
there are four factors which need to be specially considered to improve
the fatigue strength of ship structural details as follows:
- Nominal stress level.
- Geometrical stress concentration due to the structural detail
geometry.
- Weld geometry and construction tolerances.
- Residual stresses and construction procedure.
Each item outlined above is presented in the following Sections.
2.3.2
Nominal
stress level
The most efficient way to improve fatigue strength is to increase
the local scantling to reduce the nominal stress level, and hence
the hot spot stress for a given structural detail. In general, structural
details on higher tensile steel and aluminium require improvement
in detail design over the mild steel and the base grade aluminium
equivalent structural detail by virtue of the higher stress level
and the constant fatigue strength for material of various yield strength.
The advantages and disadvantages of this fatigue strength
improvement method are summarised in Table 2.2.1 Nominal stress level.
Table 2.2.1 Nominal stress level
Advantages
|
Disadvantages
|
|
Reduce stress
level.
|
|
Increase structure
weight.
|
|
Increase static
strength.
|
|
|
|
Potential decrease in
number of structural components and/or complexity required over that for a
structural detail in higher tensile strength material.
|
|
|
2.3.3
Geometrical
stress concentration
The adoption of a good detail design configuration by the provision
of soft connections reduces the geometrical stress concentration factor
due to the geometrical discontinuity to a satisfactory level. Typical
detail design improvements for the critical areas are provided in Ch 4 Detail Design Improvement for Steel/Aluminium Construction and Ch 5 Detail Design Improvement for Composite Construction of
these Guidance Notes for steel/aluminium alloy and composite construction
respectively. These detail design improvements have been developed
from the consolidation of service experience and finite element analysis.
The advantages and disadvantages of the subject fatigue
improvement method are summarised in Table 2.2.2 Geometrical stress
concentration.
Table 2.2.2 Geometrical stress
concentration
Advantages
|
Disadvantages
|
|
Reduce hot spot stress level by
reducing the local geometrical stress concentration.
|
|
May increase structural weight if additional
pieces are required.
|
|
Most effective fatigue strength improvement
technique.
|
|
Requires good workmanship where soft toe/heel are
required.
|
|
May provide additional structural
redundancy.
|
|
|
2.3.4
Weld
geometry and construction tolerances
At the design stage, special attention may be given to achieving
a favourable geometry and smooth transition at the weld toe, and minimising
secondary stress concentration which may arise from the fit up and
misalignment. Since the weld notch stress concentration is a direct
function of the weld flank angle and the weld toe radius, critical
structural details may be specified with an enhanced weld procedure
and construction tolerances.
In view of the size and hull
form of special service craft, additional considerations must, in
general, be given to the accessibility for welding. This should include
the selection of the depth, geometry and orientation of the stiffening
members to provide the necessary access to carry out the required
welding sequences, with the type and size of welding equipment available
to the Builder.
The advantages and disadvantages of the
subject fatigue improvement method are summarised in Table 2.2.3 Weld geometry and construction
tolerances.
Table 2.2.3 Weld geometry and construction
tolerances
Advantages
|
Disadvantages
|
|
The improvement may be introduced at
the design stage.
|
|
Improvement can be subject to large scatter if
not controlled under QA survey conditions i.e. Fatigue Control Plan.
|
|
The improvement is performed in the welding
process itself.
|
|
|
|
Subject to well defined inspection plan and hence
higher reliability.
|
|
|
2.3.5
Residual
stresses, and construction procedures
The minimising of residual stresses through the adoption of
appropriate welding procedures and sequences, the use of adequate
unit size, and appropriate sequence of erection of the prefabrication
unit do not constitute in themselves a fatigue strength improvement
procedure. Nevertheless careful planning should be considered at the
design stage to ensure that detrimental effects will not be introduced
during the construction process.