10 Human Machine Interface
Clasification Society 2024 - Version 9.40
Statutory Documents - IMO Publications and Documents - Resolutions - Maritime Safety Committee - Resolution MSC.252(83) - Adoption of the Revised Performance Standards for Integrated Navigation Systems (INS) - (Adopted on 8 October 2007) - Annex - Performance Standards for Integrated Navigation Systems (INS) - Module B - Task related requirements for Integrated Navigation Systems - 10 Human Machine Interface

10 Human Machine Interface

10.1 General

  10.1.1 For the design and layout of human machine interface (HMI) of the INS, MSC/Circ.982 and relevant guidance on application of SOLAS regulation V/15 adopted by the Organization should be taken into account.

  10.1.2 Integrated graphical and alphanumeric display and control functions should adopt a consistent human machine interface (HMI) philosophy and implementation.

  10.1.3 The design and implementation of the INS should ensure that it is simple to operate by a trained user.

10.2 System Design

  10.2.1 The design of the system should facilitate the tasks to be performed by the bridge team and pilot in navigating the ship safely under all operational conditions.

  10.2.2 The configuration of the equipment and presentation of information at workstations should permit observation or monitoring by the bridge team and pilot under all operating conditions.

  10.2.3 The design of the system should avoid the potential single point failure by one person during operation, and should minimize the risk of human error.

  10.2.4 The operation of the system should be designed to avoid distraction from the task of safe navigation.

10.3 Display

  10.3.1 Information should be presented consistently within and between different sub-systems. Standardized information presentation, symbols and coding should be used according to resolution MSC.191(79).

10.4 Input

  10.4.1 The INS should be so designed that the requested manual inputs are consistent throughout the system and can be easily executed.

  10.4.2 The INS should be designed that the basic functions can be easily operated.

  10.4.3 Complex or error-prone interaction with the system should be avoided.

  10.4.4 For manual inputs that may cause unintended results, the INS should request confirmation before acceptance, thus providing a plausibility check.

  10.4.5 Checks in the dialogue and in the input handling should be provided to prevent erroneous data or control inputs.

  10.4.6 Wherever possible, an “undo” function should be provided.


Copyright 2022 Clasifications Register Group Limited, International Maritime Organization, International Labour Organization or Maritime and Coastguard Agency. All rights reserved. Clasifications Register Group Limited, its affiliates and subsidiaries and their respective officers, employees or agents are, individually and collectively, referred to in this clause as 'Clasifications Register'. Clasifications Register assumes no responsibility and shall not be liable to any person for any loss, damage or expense caused by reliance on the information or advice in this document or howsoever provided, unless that person has signed a contract with the relevant Clasifications Register entity for the provision of this information or advice and in that case any responsibility or liability is exclusively on the terms and conditions set out in that contract.