1 Purpose
1.1 These guidelines aim to support the design and configuration of bridge equipment and
systems, their arrangement and integration for safe and effective operation of the
vessel under the control of the bridge team and pilot.
1.2 These guidelines aim to allow for a task oriented presentation and integration of
information on ship bridges.
1.3 These guidelines aim to assist with the management of the workload of the bridge
team; enhance the safe operation of the ship; and implementing measures intended to
reduce human errors.
1.4 These guidelines aim to be a guiding umbrella instrument for bridge equipment and
systems, their arrangement and integration.
1.5 These guidelines support the application of SOLAS regulation
V/15.
2 Scope
2.1 These guidelines provide:
2.1.1 General design principles for bridge design and arrangement
2.1.2 A methodology for the integration and arrangement of equipment and systems into an
integrated bridge.
2.1.3 Definition of major bridge tasks and configuration of workstations
2.2 The design recommendations aim to ensure that the bridge is simple to be
operated by a trained user. Guidance for the provision of onboard familiarization
material is provided, as it is a requirement of the ISM Code
that personnel working on assignments related to safety and the protection of the
environment need to be given proper familiarization with their duties.
2.3 These guidelines are recommended for manufacturers, installers, yards, suppliers and
ship surveyors with regard to bridge equipment and systems, their arrangement and
integration.
2.4 These guidelines intend to support the design of ship bridges for ships
mandated by the SOLAS Convention.
3 References
Resolution MSC.191(79)
|
Performance standards for the presentation of
navigation-related information on shipborne navigational displays
|
Resolution MSC.252(83)
|
Revised performance standards for Integrated
Navigation Systems (INS)
|
MSC/Circ.982
|
Guidelines on ergonomic criteria for bridge
equipment and layout
|
SN/Circ.243
|
Guidelines for the presentation of
navigation-related symbols, terms and abbreviations
|
SN.1/Circ.265
|
Guidelines on the application of SOLAS regulation V/15 to INS, IBS and bridge design
|
SN.1/Circ.274
|
Guidelines for application of the modular
concept to performance standards
|
SOLAS regulation IX/3
|
Safety management requirements
|
SOLAS 1974, as amended
|
The
International Convention for Safety of Life at Sea, 1974, as
amended
|
Resolution A.997(25)
|
Survey guidelines under the Harmonized System
of Survey and Certification, 2007 (HSSC)
|
4 Definitions
For the purpose of these guidelines, the definitions in Appendix 1 apply.
Module A – Configuration of workstations
5 General
5.1 To support a modular and task oriented bridge design the assignment of the main
tasks to the workstations are described generically in paragraph 6.
5.2 If an INS is provided the INS may cover parts of the recommended tasks.
5.3 Other workstations specific to the ship type or design are to comply with these
functional requirements of these guidelines, as applicable.
5.4 The description of workstations are given in the guidelines on ergonomic criteria
for bridge equipment and layoutfootnote.
5.5 The recommended equipment for the workstations is listed in the guidelines on
ergonomic criteria for bridge equipment and layoutfootnote.
6 Allocation and grouping of tasks of dedicated workstations
6.1 Workstation for navigating and manoeuvring:
6.1.1 Tasks to be supported by the workstation for navigating and manoeuvring:
-
Collision avoidance (traffic surveillance)
-
Route monitoring (grounding avoidance):
-
- Ship's position
-
- Water depth
-
- Chart information
-
Monitoring of:
-
- Heading
-
- Ship's speed
-
- Ship's rate of turn
-
- Rudder angle/thrust direction
-
- Main propulsion, RPM, pitch/thrust
-
- Wind speed and direction
-
- Time
-
Internal and external communication as necessary for the defined task
-
Monitoring and handling of alerts that are presented on the bridge
-
Manoeuvring including:
-
- Automatic steering control and operation, including non-follow up (NFU)
override control
-
- Manual steering control and operation
-
- Steering mode selection
-
- Thrusters control and operation
-
- Propulsion control and operation
-
Operation of navigation lights, sound and light signals
-
Audible surveillance – reception of sound signals
-
Operation of window wipers, washing, heating
-
Operation of searchlights
-
Acknowledgment of Bridge Navigational Watch Alarm Systems (BNWAS)
6.1.2 The following navigational tasks specified in the INS performance standards should
be supported at the workstation for navigating and manoeuvring, if provided:
6.1.3 Operation and monitoring of Centralized Alert Management HMI (CAM-HMI)footnote, if provided.
6.2 Workstation for monitoring:
6.2.1 Tasks to be supported by the workstation for monitoring:
-
Collision avoidance (traffic surveillance)
-
Route monitoring (grounding avoidance):
-
- Ship's position
-
- Water depth
-
- Chart information
-
Monitoring of:
-
- Heading
-
- Ship's speed
-
- Ship's rate of turn
-
- Rudder angle/thrust direction
-
- Main propulsion, RPM, pitch/thrust
-
- Wind speed and direction
-
- Time
-
Internal and external communication as necessary for the defined task
-
Monitoring and handling of alerts that are presented on the bridge
-
Operation of sound signals
-
Operation of window wipers, washing, heating
-
Acknowledgment of BNWAS
6.2.2 The following navigational tasks specified in the INS performance standards should
be supported at the workstation for monitoring, if provided:
-
collision avoidance
-
route monitoring
-
alert management
-
navigation control data
-
status and data display
6.2.3 Operation and monitoring of CAM-HMIfootnote, if provided.
6.3 Workstation for manual steering (Helmsman's workstation):
6.3.1 Tasks to be supported by the workstation for manual steering:
6.4 Workstation for docking (bridge wing):
6.4.1 Tasks to be supported by the workstation for docking:
-
Operation for docking, pilot and safety manoeuvres including:
-
- Steering control and operation
-
- Propulsion control and operation
-
- Thrusters control and operation
-
Monitoring of:
-
- Heading
-
- Ship's speed including longitudinal and transversal components
-
- Ship's rate of turn
-
- Rudder angle/thrust direction
-
- Main propulsion, RPM, pitch/thrust
-
- Wind speed and direction
-
Internal communication with wheelhouse (workstations for navigating and
manoeuvring, monitoring, manual steering) and manoeuvring stations
-
External communication as necessary for the defined task, e.g., with tugs/pilot
boats
-
Operation of Morse lamp and searchlight
-
Acknowledgment of BNWAS
6.5 Workstation for planning and documentation:
6.5.1 Tasks to be supported by the workstation for planning and documentation:
6.5.2 The following navigational tasks specified in the INS performance standards should
be supported at the workstation for planning and documentation (if provided):
6.6 Workstation for safety:
6.6.1 Tasks to be supported by the workstation for safety:
6.7 Workstation for communication:
6.7.1 Tasks to be supported by the workstation for communication:
-
Internal communication
-
External communication:
7 Requirements for allocation of tasks and functions
7.1 Allocation of tasks to workstations
7.1.1 The allocation of the functionality for the bridge tasks to the workstations
should support the assigned tasks for the workstation, and should be sufficiently simple
to support team working and awareness of operator roles. If task stations are provided,
the selection of the dedicated functionality should be possible by a simple operator
action.
7.1.2 Additional functionality provided at the specified workstations should not
interfere with the functionality listed in paragraph 6 of these guidelines.
7.2 Integration of functionality, operational controls and information
7.2.1 Interrelated functionality, operational controls and information should be grouped
task oriented on the workstations.
7.2.2 Interrelated functions, operational controls and information of one task should be
arranged in functional groups.
Module B – Arrangement and design – human machine interface
8 Bridge design
8.1 Every ship should at all times maintain a proper lookout by sight and
hearing as well as by all available means appropriate in the prevailing circumstances
and conditions so as to make a full appraisal of the situation and of the risk of
collision.
Therefore the requirements of MSC/Circ.982 should apply.
8.2 The field of vision should not impair the performance to maintain a proper lookout
by sight of the OOW at least at the following workstations: workstation for navigating
and manoeuvring, workstation for monitoring, workstation for manual steering (helmsman's
workstation).
8.3 The field of vision from these workstations should be such as to enable observation
of all objects which may affect the safe conning of the ship.
8.4 The field of vision from all workstations should be in accordance with regulation 22 of
SOLAS chapter V, 2002, as amended, and MSC/Circ.982.
8.5 It should be possible to maintain lookout and general surveillance of the ship at
the workstation for navigating and manoeuvring.
8.6 External sound signals from ships and fog signals that are audible on the open deck
should also be audible inside the wheelhouse; a sound reception system should be
provided to reproduce such signals inside the wheelhouse, if it is enclosed.
9 Layout and physical arrangement of workstations
9.1 For the layout and physical arrangement of workstations on the bridge the
requirements of MSC/Circ.982 and relevant guidance on application of SOLAS regulation V/15,
adopted by the Organization, should be taken into account.
9.2 Sufficient and solidly built hand grab rails should be provided on all consoles at
any workstation and as far as practicable within grab distance.
10 Design of bridge equipment
10.1 System design
10.1.1 For the design and layout of human machine interfaces (HMI), MSC/Circ.982 and relevant guidance on application of SOLAS regulation V/15
adopted by the Organizationfootnote should be taken into account.
10.1.2 The design and implementation of the systems and equipment should ensure that it
is simple to operate by a trained user.
10.1.3 The design of the systems and equipment should facilitate the tasks to be
performed by the bridge team and pilot in navigating the ship safely under all
operational conditions.
10.1.4 The configuration of the systems and equipment and presentation of information at
workstations should permit observation or monitoring by the bridge team and pilot under
all operating conditions.
10.1.5 The operation of the systems and equipment should be designed to avoid
distraction from the task of safe navigation.
10.1.6 Integrated graphical and alphanumeric display and control functions should adopt
a consistent human machine interface (HMI) philosophy and implementation.
10.1.7 A central dimming functionality should be provided to adjust the illumination of
task stations, displays, controls and panel labels with one control function for the
bridge and/or equipment integrated in a console. Exclusions are permitted for equipment
which do not provide a digital interface. Individual dimming of the task stations,
displays, functional groups of controls and panel labels should also be possible.
Guidance on dimming is also provided in MSC/Circ.982.
10.2 Operation of equipment – data input
10.2.1 The operation of equipment should conform to the general principles of MSC/Circ.982.
10.2.2 The bridge should be so designed that the requested manual inputs are consistent
throughout the systems and equipment as far as practicable and can be easily
executed.
10.2.3 The systems and equipment should be designed that the basic functions can be
easily operated.
10.2.4 Complex or error-prone interaction with the systems and equipment should be
avoided.
10.2.5 Checks in the dialogue and in the input handling should be provided to prevent
erroneous data or control inputs (e.g., plausibility checks).
10.2.6 For manual inputs that may cause unintended results, the systems and equipment
should request confirmation before acceptance.
10.3 Presentation of information
10.3.1 The information on the bridge should be presented according to the general
principles of resolution MSC.191(79) and MSC/Circ.982.
10.3.2 Mode and status awareness
10.3.2.1 The operational mode in use should be clearly indicated to the bridge team and
pilot.
10.3.2.2 If the mode in use is not the normal mode to fully perform the functions, this
should be clearly indicated.
Example of modes other than the normal mode are:
-
degraded condition modes, in which the systems cannot fully perform all
functions
-
"service modes"
-
simulation mode
-
training (familiarization) mode
10.3.2.3 If the system is in a degraded condition this should be sufficiently clear that
the bridge team and pilot can understand the nature of the failure and its
consequences.
10.3.2.4 The systems should indicate the operational status of automated functions and
integrated components, systems and/or subsystems.
Module C – Fault tolerance
11 Backup and redundancies
11.1 Adequate backup arrangements should be provided to ensure safe operation in case of
a failure.
11.2 In case of failure of one part or function, including network failure, it should be
possible to operate each other individual part or function separately, except for those
functions directly dependent on the defective part; at least the requirements specified
for individual equipment adopted by the Organization should be met, as far as
applicable.
11.3 The backup arrangement should enable a safe takeover and ensure that a failure does
not result in an unintentional and/or critical system status.
11.4 The failure of a single task station should not result in the loss of a function
mandated by the carriage requirements of SOLAS.
11.5 In case of a breakdown of one task station, at least one task station should be
able to take over the tasks.
12 System failures and fallback arrangements
12.1 The systems should have the capability of allowing the operator to decline or
override the automated ship control functions at any time or intervene part way through
a process by means of a simple operator action.
12.2 An integrated system should have the capability to re-establish the functional
consistency after an interface failure.
12.3 Software requirements should be in compliance with resolution A.694(17) and in accordance with specifications at least
equivalent to those acceptable to the Organizationfootnote.
Module D – Interfacing
13 Interfacing, data transfer
13.1 To support a modular bridge design standardized interfaces should be implemented
for sensor/source and operational/functional modules. Guidance on requirements for
standardized interfaces is listed in resolution MSC.252(83).
13.2 The communication should allow the implementation of the tasks/functions listed in
these guidelines.
13.3 The communication should be based on standardized communication protocol as far as
applicable. Sensor/source and operational/functional modules may use alternative
internal concepts.
13.4 This communication should be in compliance within the following requirements as far
as practicable:
-
.1 self-alignment of interface parameters;
-
.2 automatic re-synchronization after disconnection or power failure;
-
.3 unique identification of data source which includes at least cluster, function,
additionally time where necessary;
-
.4 provision of consistent data related to time and other relevant aspects, e.g.,
reference points; and
-
.5 ensure the consistency of data transmission.
14 Power supply
14.1 The power supply requirements applying to parts of an integrated system as a result
of the requirements specified for the individual equipment by the Organization should
remain applicable.
14.2 Mandatory equipment and functions/equipment necessary for the safe navigation
should be supplied at least:
-
.1 from both the main and the emergency source of electrical power with automated
changeover through a local distribution board with provision to preclude
inadvertent shutdown; and
-
.2 from a transitional source of electrical power for a duration of not less than
45 s.
Module E – System configuration and integration
15 Modular concept
The design of an integrated system should be modular with operational/functional and
sensor/source modules. The modules are defined in the guidelines for the application of
the modular concept to performance standards (SN.1/Circ.274).
16 Integration
16.1 The integration of functions of individual equipment into an integrated system
should not degrade the performance below the requirements specified for the individual
equipment by the Organization.
16.2 Integrated systems and integrations combining on a functional level at least two
tasks specified in resolution MSC.252(83) or one task and track control should conform regarding the
integration of information to the relevant requirements of Module A of resolution MSC.252(83).
16.3 For integrated systems or integrations that do not meet the definition of an INS
according to resolution MSC.252(83), the principles of the INS performance standards should be
applied as appropriate to the functions being integrated.
Module F – System and equipment documentation
17 Manuals
17.1 Operating manuals should be provided which include as far as applicable:
-
functional description
-
the redundancy and backup concept and the availability of functions
-
default modes and limits
-
a description of alerts and related failures and their effects on the system
-
guidance for the adjustment of the limits for alerts
-
details of each data convention and common references: attitude axis, rotation,
reference location of Consistent Common Reference Point (CCRP)
-
for automatic control functions (e.g., for heading, track or speed) details of
override and/or bypassing.
17.2 Installation manuals should be provided to allow the systems to be installed so
that they can meet all requirements adopted by the Organization.
17.3 The installation manuals should include:
-
information of systems, sensor/sources, components, interconnections, automatic
control functions and interfaces
-
the details of the power supply arrangements
-
recommendations on the physical layout of equipment and necessary space for
maintenance.
18 Information regarding system configuration for surveyor
18.1 Manufacturer or system integrator should declare the following information relating
to the system configuration, if applicable:
Further information is provided in resolution A.997(25).
18.2 Failure analysis, at functional level, should be documented as far as practicable.
The failure analysis should verify that the systems are designed on "fail-to-safe"
principle and that a failure of one part of an integrated system should not affect the
functionality of other parts, except for those functions directly dependent on the
defective part.
19 Guidance to equipment manufactures for the provision of onboard familiarization
material
19.1 Material enabling onboard familiarization training should be provided. The onboard
familiarization material should explain all configuration, functions, limitations,
controls, displays, alerts and indications. Guidance for equipment manufactures for the
provision of onboard familiarization material is listed in appendix 2 of resolution
MSC.252(83) for INS.