1.3.1 If direct calculations are employed for the derivation of design loads, the method in
accordance with Ch 1, 4 Load response analysis in the ShipRight Procedure
for Ship Units is to be applied for the short-term/long-term value
calculations based on the target return periods. All the direct calculations and the
detailed methodology are to be submitted for examination.
1.3.2 The hull girder wave loads, motions and accelerations, where required, are to be
derived in place of Rule values for the purpose of local scantlings. In no case
should the design loads from direct calculations be less than 50 per cent of the
25-year return period dynamic loads defined for unrestricted worldwide transit
service.
1.3.3 For strength assessment purposes, design loads in the required ShipRight Strength
Design Assessment Procedure can be obtained by direct calculations, if required.
1.3.4 The environmental loads for scantling and strength assessment of the installation at
a fixed location are to be determined at the following return periods:
- 10-year return period for transit/towing;
- 100-year return period for on-site operation, unless the design life is
substantially lower than 20 years.
1.3.5 Site-specific metocean or wave scatter data should be submitted for review prior to
its use for the design load calculations of on-site operation. The wave scatter data
of the Owner-defined transit route may be used for the transit analysis.
1.3.6 Long-term values are to be derived based on the target return period. The long-term
values of site-specific operation are to be obtained without the effect of the
mooring system. The heading probabilities shall be taken into account instead of
equal heading probabilities, where applicable. In general, short-term analysis is
performed for transit/towing analysis.
1.3.7 Multi-body interaction
- If a nearshore unit will be moored in close
proximity to other vessels or large structures, the hydrodynamic
interactions between the large structures can amplify the motions. Piers can
also generate high standing waves due to wave reflection, whereas dolphins
or pile-based structures may be ignored for such interactions. However, if
the structures will not be located in close proximity under extreme weather
conditions, then multi-body effect needs not to be taken into account for
the strength assessment.
- A hydrodynamic analysis carried out in the
absence of the adjacent large structure may yield motion responses that are
smaller than those obtained with multi-body interactions. To take this
effect into account, RAOs (Response Amplitude Operators) that include the
presence of adjacent structures are to be obtained before calculating the
long-term values. Appropriate viscous damping should be included in the gap
between the structures to prevent gap resonance behaviour in the case of
diffraction analysis. Alternatively, proper multi-body amplification factors
may be studied and applied to the long-term values obtained from single hull
RAOs. More details about multi-body hydrodynamic analysis can be found in
Ch 1, 4 Hydrodynamic analysis in the ShipRight Procedure for
Long-term Nearshore Positional Mooring System.
1.3.8 Shallow water depth may transform the waves and vessel motions. Hydrodynamic analysis
for the site-specific condition is to be carried out at the most unfavourable water
depth in consideration of the tidal variation, including the shallow water effects.