Appendix 3 – Example of the Development of an Assessment (refers to an assessment for SOLAS regulation II-2/22)
Clasification Society 2024 - Version 9.40
Statutory Documents - IMO Publications and Documents - Circulars - Maritime Safety Committee - MSC.1/Circular.1369 – Interim Explanatory Notes for the Assessment of Passenger Ship Systems' Capabilities After a Fire or Flooding Casualty– (22 June 2010)1 - Annex – Interim Explanatory Notes for the Assessment of Passenger Ship Systems Capabilities After A Fire or Flooding Casualty - Appendix 3 – Example of the Development of an Assessment (refers to an assessment for SOLAS regulation II-2/22)

Appendix 3 – Example of the Development of an Assessment (refers to an assessment for SOLAS regulation II-2/22)

 Note: Users should note that the example provided represents one way of handling an assessment as other approaches could be equally effective.

 The assessment is developed adopting the following steps:

  Step 1 – Identification of all essential systems and any required auxiliaries and support systems.

  Step 2– For each deck of each MVZ, determination of which essential systems are present.

  Step 3– For each essential system that is located in the MVZ under analysis, verification of the availability of an alternative in another location.

  Step 4– Essential systems without a suitable alternative in another location must be protected from a fire/flooding casualty.

  Step 5– For each critical system, determination of how the cables, pipes, components will be protected. A hierarchy for protecting critical systems is proposed as follows:

1. First Solution — Provide an alternative in a MVZ not affected by the casualty

  Example: A main power cable for the GMDSS system passes through the MVZ on deck 3. In a fire this cable could be damaged. An emergency power cable is routed from a different direction to the navigation bridge that does not pass through this area. The conclusion is that further analysis is not needed. Damage to the power cable does not affect the ship's safe return to port capability.

2. Second solution — Protect the essential system within the MVZ under analysis

  Example: In the case of the a.m. power cable, it is determined that only a short length of cable passes through the MVZ under consideration, located 5 m above the deck. An A-60 trunk is installed to protect the cable to preclude fire damage.

3. Third solution — Provide a repair or manual action to compensate for loss of the system

  Example: – Another essential system cable is analysed, and it is determined that the cable is routed throughout the MVZ at various levels and construction of an A-60 trunk is not practicable. Instead, a repair cable is prepared and staged with necessary tools at a protected location. If the cable is damaged from a fire in the MVZ under analysis, the crew is able to temporarily re-route power from another location using the repair cable.


Copyright 2022 Clasifications Register Group Limited, International Maritime Organization, International Labour Organization or Maritime and Coastguard Agency. All rights reserved. Clasifications Register Group Limited, its affiliates and subsidiaries and their respective officers, employees or agents are, individually and collectively, referred to in this clause as 'Clasifications Register'. Clasifications Register assumes no responsibility and shall not be liable to any person for any loss, damage or expense caused by reliance on the information or advice in this document or howsoever provided, unless that person has signed a contract with the relevant Clasifications Register entity for the provision of this information or advice and in that case any responsibility or liability is exclusively on the terms and conditions set out in that contract.