2.1 A proposal for the minimum safe manning of
a ship submitted by a company to the Administration should be evaluated
by the Administration to ensure that:
-
.1 the proposed ship's complement contains the
number and grades/capacities of personnel to fulfil the tasks, duties
and responsibilities required for the safe operation of the ship,
for its security, for protection of the marine environment and for
dealing with emergency situations; and
-
.2 the master, officers and other members of the
ship's complement are not required to work more hours than is safe
in relation to the performance of their duties and the safety of the
ship and that the requirements for work and rest hours, in accordance
with applicable national regulations, can be complied with.
2.2 In applying such principles, Administrations
should take proper account of existing IMO, ILO, ITU and WHO instruments
in force which deal with:
-
.1 watchkeeping;
-
.2 hours of work or rest;
-
.3 safety management;
-
.4 certification of seafarers;
-
.5 training of seafarers;
-
.6 occupational safety, health and hygiene;
-
.7 crew accommodation and food;
-
.8 security; and
-
.9 radiocommunications.
2.3 The Administration should require a company
to amend a proposal for the minimum safe manning of a ship if, after
evaluation of the original proposal submitted by the company, the
Administration is unable to approve the proposed composition of the
ship's complement.
2.4 The Administration should only approve a proposal
for the minimum safe manning of a ship and issue accordingly a minimum
safe manning document if it is fully satisfied that the proposed ship's
complement is established in accordance with the principles, recommendations
and guidelines contained in this resolution, and is adequate in all
respects for the safe operation and the security of the ship and for
the protection of the marine environment.
2.5 The Administration may withdraw the minimum
safe manning document of a ship if the company fails to submit a new
proposal for the ship's minimum safe manning when changes in trading
area(s), construction, machinery, equipment or operation and maintenance
of the ship have taken place which affect the minimum safe manning.
2.6 The Administration should review and may withdraw,
as appropriate, the minimum safe manning document of a ship which
persistently fails to be in compliance with rest hours requirements.
2.7 The Administration should consider the circumstances
very carefully before allowing a minimum safe manning document to
contain provisions for less than three qualified officers in charge
of a navigational watch, while taking into account all the principles
for establishing safe manning.