(NOT IN PRIORITY ORDER)
In the following list, items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5(b), 6, 7, and 11 are checked against the IHO
DPPC dataset dated November 2011:
1 Inability to correctly display symbols for IMO-approved features such as ASLs or PSSAs
– ECDIS equipment that does not have the latest version of the IHO Presentation Library
installed will, instead of displaying the correct symbol, either show question marks (?)
or nothing at all. In some cases the ECDIS may fail to load an ENC that includes such
data. An ECDIS retains its type approval certificate regardless of the version of the
Presentation Library installed.
2 Incorrect display of foul areas and obstructions in some ECDIS equipment – some ECDIS
models do not show some underwater features in Standard display mode as expected
(however they do activate appropriate alarms). These features are only displayed when
the "All" or "Other" display mode is used. Also in some cases different symbols are used
to depict these features.
3 On some occasions some stranded/dangerous wrecks and obstructions may not display in
any mode; it is believed that this is limited to some ECDIS versions from a single
manufacturer who has now produced a software amendment to resolve the problem.
4 An object that falls on a contour line may fail to display in "Standard"
mode in some ECDIS equipment.
5 Small (point) land areas, especially those depicted only on small scale
(usage band 1 and 2) ENCs may not always be clearly displayed and do not always activate
alarms in route planning or route monitoring modes in some ECDIS equipment:
-
(a) it is possible for small land features to be obscured by other chart
detail such as names or contour labels; and
-
(b) some ECDIS equipment may not conduct route checks on small scale ENCs and
may therefore not provide an appropriate warning. Where this is the case the
land area may not be detected by the "look-ahead" function during route
monitoring.
-
Workaround – careful manual inspection of the largest scale
ENC available.
Due to the limitations of ECDIS referred to in 5(a) above, mariners (even those using the
most modern systems) should always undertake careful visual inspection of the entire
planned route using the "Other/All" display mode to confirm that it, and any deviations
from it, are clear of dangers.
6 Incorrect display of the coloured arcs of light sectors – some ECDIS may not display
the coloured arcs of complex lights as intended. This is especially prevalent where the
sectors straddle 0/360deg (North).
7 Some early models of ECDIS are unable to display correctly time-variable data encoded
in ENCs. For example features with Date Start and Date End attributes used for the
implementation of new traffic routeing measures in ENCs may not be depicted correctly;
the result being that both old and new instances are displayed simultaneously. Tests for
this were not included in IEC61174 Edition1.
8 Tidal stream data not available in usable form – some early models of ECDIS
only provide a comma-separated list of values which is difficult to interpret and use.
9 Display of anchorage, berth and channel names may not be easily visible to
the mariner and the radius of a maximum swinging circle may not be shown.
10 Three hundred and sixty degree landfall lights not always prominent in
comparison to shorter range sector lights.
11 ENCs may include certain shoal soundings, especially reported depths, which have been
encoded in such a way that they do not display in "Standard" Mode and might not activate
an alarm even where the depth is less than the safety contour setting. Most Hydrographic
Offices have reported to IHO that they have updated the relevant ENCs to ensure that
significant depths are displayed in Standard Mode.
12 Areas of foul ground that have no known depth value may be depicted in some ECDIS as
isolated dangers and shown in "Standard" mode; this can result in unnecessary screen
clutter.
13 Where ECDIS includes an option to show isolated dangers in waters shoaler than the
safety contour value the symbology used may vary between manufacturers.
14 Screen clutter can be a problem when displaying smaller scale ENCs for areas where
larger scale coverage is also loaded in ECDIS. This can be more apparent when the user
zooms out. This is due to a combination of each manufacturer's ENC loading strategy and
the individual ENC producer's encoding policy. Where Hydrographic Offices use SCAMIN
(scale minimum) attributes on chart features then this problem is minimized. The
intention of the IHO standard is that ECDIS should not display ENC data which has a
compilation scale significantly different from the display scale in use. Improvements
could be made, in future, by adopting a standardized ENC loading strategy based on a
scale range defined within the ENC.
15 In some ECDIS equipment the text for some notes in the ENC may be truncated or not
displayed at all, and therefore is not available to the mariner.
16 Unnecessary alarms and indications – feedback from mariners shows that
ECDIS can produce excessive and distracting alarms. This is due to a combination of the
interpretation of the requirements of the ECDIS Performance Standards and the ENC
encoding. Some control over the number of alarms and indications is available to the
mariner in ECDIS built to the revised Performance Standards (resolution MSC.232(82)), but this is not always recognized.