Section 5 Use of existing results for similar crankshafts
Clasification Society 2024 - Version 9.40
Clasifications Register Guidance Information - Guidance Notes for the Calculation of Stress Concentration Factors, Fatigue Enhancement Methods and Evaluation of Fatigue Tests for Crankshafts, July 2021 - Chapter 2 Guidance for Evaluation of Fatigue Tests - Section 5 Use of existing results for similar crankshafts

Section 5 Use of existing results for similar crankshafts

5.1 Reuse of results

5.1.1 For fillets or oil bores without surface treatment, the fatigue properties found by testing may be used for similar crankshaft designs providing:
  1. Material:
    • Similar material type;
    • Cleanliness on the same or better level;
    • The same mechanical properties can be granted (size versus hardenability).
  2. Geometry:
    • Difference in the size effect of stress gradient is insignificant or it is considered;
    • Principal stress direction is equivalent. See Ch 2, 3 Small specimen testing.
  3. Manufacturing:
    • Similar manufacturing process.

5.1.2 Induction hardened or gas-nitrided crankshafts will suffer fatigue either at the surface or at the transition to the core. The surface fatigue strength as determined by fatigue tests of full size cranks, may be used on an equal or similar design as the tested crankshaft when the fatigue initiation occurred at the surface. By ‘similar design’ it means that a similar material type and surface hardness are used, and the fillet radius and hardening depth are within approximately ± 30 per cent of the tested crankshaft.

5.1.3 Fatigue initiation in the transition zone can be either subsurface, i.e. below the hard layer, or at the surface where the hardening ends. The fatigue strength at the transition to the core can be determined by fatigue tests as described above, provided that the fatigue initiation occurred at the transition to the core. Tests made with the core material only will not be representative since the tension residual stresses at the transition are lacking.

5.1.4 It must also be noted what some recent research has shown: the fatigue limit can decrease in the very high cycle domain with subsurface crack initiation due to trapped hydrogen that accumulates through diffusion around some internal defect functioning as an initiation point. In these cases, it would be appropriate to reduce the fatigue limit by some per cent per decade of cycles beyond 107. Based on a publication by Yukitaka Murakami 'Metal Fatigue: Effects of Small Defects and Non-metallic Inclusions, the reduction is suggested to be 5 per cent per decade, especially when the hydrogen content is considered to be high.


Copyright 2022 Clasifications Register Group Limited, International Maritime Organization, International Labour Organization or Maritime and Coastguard Agency. All rights reserved. Clasifications Register Group Limited, its affiliates and subsidiaries and their respective officers, employees or agents are, individually and collectively, referred to in this clause as 'Clasifications Register'. Clasifications Register assumes no responsibility and shall not be liable to any person for any loss, damage or expense caused by reliance on the information or advice in this document or howsoever provided, unless that person has signed a contract with the relevant Clasifications Register entity for the provision of this information or advice and in that case any responsibility or liability is exclusively on the terms and conditions set out in that contract.