Annex - Advice on the Dangers of Flooding of Forward Compartments
Clasification Society 2024 - Version 9.40
Statutory Documents - IMO Publications and Documents - Circulars - Maritime Safety Committee - MSC/Circular.995 – Advice on the Dangers of Flooding of Forward Compartments – (Adopted on 11 June 2001) - Annex - Advice on the Dangers of Flooding of Forward Compartments

Annex - Advice on the Dangers of Flooding of Forward Compartments

 The capesize Oil Bulk Ore Carrier mv Derbyshire sank off Okinawa in Typhoon ORCHID in September 1980 with the loss of 44 lives. The cause of her sinking remained a mystery until 1994 when, using modern deep-sea underwater techniques an expedition located the wreck. This preliminary expedition led to a detailed survey of the wreck in 1997 which revealed aspects of the sinking that showed - after subsequent research using testing tank models - that the initial cause of sinking was progressive flooding of forward spaces.

 The Derbyshire initially suffered damage to the air pipes serving the fore peak tank and the forward bosun's store. The damage was attributed to the impact of heavy seas on air pipes and, possibly, the displacement of the starboard windlass, which then caused further damage.

 The research that was commissioned subsequent to the findings at the wreck site showed that large volumes of water can be taken in through damaged air pipes of the size and type typically fitted to bulk carriers and tankers to serve forward tanks. Flooding rates in excess of 400 cubic metres per hour through a single 300 mm air pipe were found to be possible in relatively heavy but by no means extreme seas.

 Flooding of the fore peak and the forward ballast tank through air pipes caused the ship to trim by the head and reduce the effective bow height. Statistical analysis of tank test results indicated that, although there was a low probability of the ship meeting a hatch-breaking wave in her intact condition, a reduction in bow height of as little as 1.1m could lead to a 70% probability of encountering a hatch-breaking wave (depending on speed, etc). The hatch covers of Nos.1 and 2 cargo holds subsequently failed allowing rapid flooding of those spaces. The ship was then in a condition beyond its survival capability.

 The evidence considered by the investigation indicated that these events took place rapidly. There was no evidence that any attempt to abandon ship had been possible. The events took place almost certainly at night and it was concluded that in such circumstances the ship's crew would have been unlikely to have detected the impending disastrous circumstances until the ship was already doomed.

 Masters - particularly those who sail on large ships where the bridge is remote from the forward spaces - need to be especially vigilant that the weathertight integrity of their ship is fully maintained. After initial battening down, regular checks should be made to detect any reduction in the integrity of the closing arrangements. In particular:

  • Spaces that are entered on a routine basis should be subject to a careful check after their use to ensure that watertight integrity is fully restored.
  • Rope and other hatches should have their fixing arrangements checked to compensate for any slackening of toggles or other fixing devices.
  • Bilges and tanks should be regularly sounded and any ingress of water investigated.
  • Where bilge alarms are fitted, they should be regularly tested.
  • Pumping arrangements in forward spaces should be regularly checked for operational effectiveness.

 Owners of ships without bilge alarms in remote forward spaces should consider fitting such devices with audible and visual indication on the bridge.

 Masters should consider early evasive action in the event that severe weather systems approach the region in which the ship is navigating. Due regard should be had to the handling characteristics of the ship and any limitations of control that may lead to the ship being dangerously exposed to the forces of such extreme weather.

 Masters should keep owners or managers advised when weather conditions deteriorate necessitating evasive action. Such advice should include position, course and speed and should be given more frequently in proportion to the severity of the weather and the limitations imposed on the ship's progress.


Copyright 2022 Clasifications Register Group Limited, International Maritime Organization, International Labour Organization or Maritime and Coastguard Agency. All rights reserved. Clasifications Register Group Limited, its affiliates and subsidiaries and their respective officers, employees or agents are, individually and collectively, referred to in this clause as 'Clasifications Register'. Clasifications Register assumes no responsibility and shall not be liable to any person for any loss, damage or expense caused by reliance on the information or advice in this document or howsoever provided, unless that person has signed a contract with the relevant Clasifications Register entity for the provision of this information or advice and in that case any responsibility or liability is exclusively on the terms and conditions set out in that contract.