6.1 The worst intended conditions of
wind and sea may not be available for the conduct of the verification
trials required by chapter 17 of the Code, in which case some extrapolation
of satisfactory trial results may be necessary. Any extrapolation
should take account of the non-linear nature of seakeeping behaviour
and of variation in wave period (frequency) and height (amplitude).
In such cases, the worst intended conditions specified
on the craft’s Permit to Operate should not be more than 130%
of the significant wave height in which the verification trials were
conducted. Extrapolation of wave period should be conducted separately
from wave height. Where satisfactory trials have been completed on
a craft, those trials are not required on subsequent identical sister
craft, provided the operational envelope of wave height and wave period
is not significantly changed. Any extrapolation based on trial results
of another closely similar design of similar size (length and breadth
both within 5% of that of the craft in question) should be verified
through trials of the new craft. Extrapolation is not applicable to
trials conducted under section 5.5 of these Guidelines.
6.2 In order that extrapolation of wave height
may be conducted in a consistent manner, a minimum wave period should
be associated with each significant wave height used to establish
the worst intended conditions.