Different undesirable events may have different orders of
acceptable probability. In connection with this, it is convenient
to agree on standardized expressions to be used to convey the relatively
acceptable probabilities of various occurrences, i.e. to perform a
qualitative ranking process.
2.1.1
Occurrence is a condition involving
a potential lowering of the level of safety.
2.1.2
Failure is an occurrence in
which a part, or parts, of the craft fail or malfunction, e.g. runaway.
A failure includes:
-
.1 a single failure;
-
.2 independent failures in combination within
a system;
-
.3 independent failures in combinations involving
more than one system, taking into account:
-
.4 common cause failure (failure of more than
one component or system due to the same cause).
2.1.3
Event is an occurrence which
has its origin outside the craft (e.g. waves).
2.1.4
Error is an occurrence arising
as a result of incorrect action by the operating crew or maintenance
personnel.
2.2
Probability of occurrences
2.2.1
Frequent is one which is likely
to occur often during the operational life of a particular craft.
2.2.2
Reasonably probable is one
which is unlikely to occur often but which may occur several times
during the total operational life of a particular craft.
2.2.3
Recurrent is a term embracing
the total range of frequent and reasonably probable.
2.2.4
Remote is one which is unlikely
to occur to every craft but may occur to a few craft of a type over
the total operational life of a number of craft of the same type.
2.2.5
Extremely remote is one which
is unlikely to occur when considering the total operational life of
a number of craft of the type, but nevertheless shall be considered
as being possible.
2.2.6
Extremely improbable is one
which is so extremely remote that it shall not be considered as possible
to occur.
2.3.1
Effect is a situation arising
as a result of an occurrence.
2.3.2
Minor effect is an effect which
may arise from a failure, an event, or an error, as defined in 2.1.2,
2.1.3, 2.1.4, which can be readily compensated for by the operating
crew. It may involve:
-
.1 a small increase in the operational duties
of the crew or in their difficulty in performing their duties; or
-
.2 a moderate degradation in handling characteristics;
or
-
.3 slight modification of the permissible operating
conditions.
2.3.3
Major effect is an effect which
produces:
-
.1 a significant increase in the operational duties
of the crew or in their difficulty in performing their duties which
by itself shall not be outside the capability of a competent crew
provided that another major effect does not occur at the same time;
or
-
.2 significant degradation in handling characteristics;
or
-
.3 significant modification of the permissible
operating conditions, but will not remove the capability to complete
a safe journey without demanding more than normal skill on the part
of the operating crew.
2.3.4
Hazardous effect is an effect
which produces:
-
.1 a dangerous increase in the operational duties
of the crew or in their difficulty in performing their duties of such
magnitude that they cannot reasonably be expected to cope with them
and will probably require outside assistance; or
-
.2 dangerous degradation of handling characteristics;
or
-
.3 dangerous degradation of the strength of the
craft; or
-
.4 marginal conditions for, or injury to, occupants;
or
-
.5 an essential need for outside rescue operations.
2.3.5
Catastrophic effect is an effect
which results in the loss of the craft and/or in fatalities.
2.4
Safety level
Safety level is a numerical value characterizing
the relationship between craft performance represented as horizontal
single-amplitude acceleration (g) and the severity of
acceleration-load effects on standing and sitting humans.
The
safety levels and the corresponding severity of effects on passengers
and safety criteria for craft performance shall be as defined in table 1.
EFFECT
|
CRITERIA NOT TO BE EXCEEDED
|
COMMENTS
|
Type of load
|
Value2
|
LEVEL 1
|
Maximum
acceleration measured horizontally¹
|
0.20g
|
0.08g:
Elderly person will keep balance when holding.
|
MINOR EFFECT
|
|
|
0.15g: Mean
person will balance when holding.
|
Moderate degradation of safety
|
|
|
0.15g:
Sitting person will start holding.
|
LEVEL 2
|
Maximum
acceleration measured horizontally¹
|
0.35g
|
0.25g:
Maximum load for mean person keeping balance when holding.
|
MAJOR EFFECT
|
|
|
0.45g: Mean
person falls out of seat when not wearing seat belts.
|
Significant degradation of safety
|
|
|
|
LEVEL 3
|
Collision
design condition (calculated)
|
Ref.
4.3.3
|
Risk of
injury to passengers; safe emergency after collision.
|
HAZARDOUS EFFECT
|
Maximum
structural design load,
|
|
|
Major degradation of safety
|
based on
vertical acceleration at centre of gravity
|
Ref.
4.3.1
|
1.0g:
Degradation of passenger safety.
|
LEVEL 4
|
|
|
Loss of
craft or/and fatalities.
|
CATASTROPHIC EFFECT
|
|
|
|
|
¹
|
The accelerometers used shall have an accuracy of at least 5%
full scale and shall have a frequency response bandwidth of at least 0.2Hz
to 20 Hz. Sampling frequency shall not be lower than 40 Hz. Filtering is
recommended to eliminate any influence from machinery vibrations.
|
²
|
g = gravity acceleration (9.81 m/s²)
|