Section 5 Components
5.1 Piping system requirements
5.1.1
Piping scantlings
- Piping systems shall be designed in accordance with recognised Standards.
- The following criteria shall be used for determining pipe
wall thickness.
The wall thickness of pipes shall not be
less than:
where
|
t
o
|
= |
theoretical thickness |
|
t
o
|
= |
|
with
|
D
|
= |
outside diameter (mm) |
|
e
|
= |
efficiency factor equal to 1,0 for seamless pipes and
for longitudinally or spirally welded pipes, delivered by approved
manufacturers of welded pipes, that are considered equivalent to
seamless pipes when non destructive testing on welds is carried out in
accordance with Recognised Standards. In other cases an efficiency
factor of less than 1,0, in accordance with recognised Standards, may
be required depending on the manufacturing process |
|
b
|
= |
allowance for bending (mm). The value of b should
be chosen so that the calculated stress in the bend, due to internal
pressure only, does not exceed the allowable stress. Where such
justification is not given, b should be: |
|
b
|
= |
|
with
|
r
|
= |
mean radius of the bend (mm) |
|
c
|
= |
corrosion allowance (mm). If corrosion or erosion is
expected the wall thickness of the piping shall be increased over that
required by other design requirements. This allowance shall be
consistent with the expected life of the piping |
|
a
|
= |
negative manufacturing tolerance for thickness (per
cent). |
5.1.2 The minimum wall thickness shall be in accordance with recognised
Standards.
5.1.3 Where necessary for mechanical strength to prevent damage, collapse,
excessive sag or buckling of pipes due to superimposed loads, the wall thickness
shall be increased over that required by Pt 11, Ch 5, 5.1 Piping system requirements 5.1.1 or, if this is impracticable or would cause
excessive local stresses, these loads shall be reduced, protected against or
eliminated by other design methods. Such superimposed loads may be due to; supporting
structures, deflections of the ship unit, liquid pressure surge during transfer
operations, the weight of suspended valves, reaction to loading arm connections, or
otherwise.
5.1.4
Flanges, valves and fittings
- Flanges, valves and other fittings shall comply with recognised
Standards, taking into account the material selected and the design pressure
defined in Pt 11, Ch 5, 2 Design aspects. For bellows expansion joints used in vapour
service, a lower minimum design pressure may be accepted.
- For flanges not complying with a recognised Standard, the
dimensions of flanges and related bolts shall be to the satisfaction of
LR.
- All emergency shutdown valves shall be of the ‘fire closed’ type.
(See
Pt 11, Ch 5, 6.2 Testing requirements 6.2.1 and Pt 11, Ch 18, 4.2 ESD valve requirements).
- The design and installation of expansion bellows shall be in
accordance with recognised Standards and be fitted with means to prevent damage
due to over-extension or compression.
5.1.5
Ship unit cargo hoses
- Liquid and vapour hoses used for cargo transfer shall be compatible with the
cargo and suitable for the cargo temperature.
- Hoses subject to tank pressure, or the discharge pressure of pumps or vapour
compressors, shall be designed for a bursting pressure not less than five times
the maximum pressure the hose will be subjected to during cargo transfer.
- Each new type of cargo hose, complete with end fittings, shall be
prototype-tested at a normal ambient temperature, with 200 pressure cycles from
zero to at least twice the specified maximum working pressure. After this cycle
pressure test has been carried out, the prototype test shall demonstrate a
bursting pressure of at least 5 times its specified maximum working pressure at
the upper and lower extreme service temperature. Hoses used for prototype
testing shall not be used for cargo service. Thereafter, before being placed in
service, each new length of cargo hose produced shall be hydrostatically tested
at ambient temperature to a pressure not less than 1,5 times its specified
maximum working pressure, but not more than two fifths of its bursting
pressure. The hose shall be stencilled or otherwise marked with the date of
testing, its specified maximum working pressure and, if used in services other
than ambient temperature services, its maximum and minimum service temperature,
as applicable. The specified maximum working pressure shall not be less than 1
MPa.
5.2 Stress aspects
5.2.1
Allowable stress
- For pipes, the allowable stress to be considered in the formula
for t in Pt 11, Ch 5, 5.1 Piping system requirements 5.1.1 is the lower of the
following values:
Rm/A or Re/B
where
|
Rm
|
= |
specified minimum tensile strength at room temperature
(N/mm2) |
|
Re
|
= |
specified minimum yield stress at room temperature
(N/mm2). If the stress strain curve does not show a
defined yield stress, the 0,2 per cent proof stress applies. |
The values of A and B shall have values of at
least A = 2,7 and B = 1,8.
5.2.2
High pressure gas fuel outer pipes or ducting scantlings
-
In fuel gas piping systems of design pressure greater than the
critical pressure, the tangential membrane stress of a straight section of pipe
or ducting shall not exceed the tensile strength divided by 1,5 (i.e.
Rm
/1,5) when subjected to the design pressure specified in Pt 11, Ch 5, 2 Design aspects. The pressure ratings of all other piping
components shall reflect the same level of strength as straight pipes.
5.2.3
Stress analysis
- When the design temperature is –110°C or colder, a complete stress analysis,
taking into account all the stresses due to weight of pipes, including
acceleration loads if significant, internal pressure, thermal contraction and
loads induced by hogging and sagging of the ship unit for each branch of the
piping system shall be submitted to LR. For temperatures above –110°C, a stress
analysis may be required by LR in relation to such matters as the design or
stiffness of the piping system and the choice of materials. In any case,
consideration should be given to thermal stresses even though calculations are
not submitted. The analysis may be carried out according to a Code of Practice
acceptable to LR.
|