5.7 A shipowner/operator when entering into a
contract with a PMSC should ensure that the command and control structure
linking the ship operator, the master, the ship's officers and the
PCASP team leader has been clearly defined and documented.
5.8 Further, prior to boarding the PCASP, the
shipowner should ensure that the master and crew are briefed and exercises
are planned and conducted so that all the roles and responsibilities
are understood by all personnel on board prior to entering the HRA.
5.9 In order to provide the required clarity,
the documented command and control structure should provide:
-
.1 a clear statement recognizing that at all times
the Master remains in command and retains the overriding authority
on board, and an agreed procedure in the event of the Master being
unavailable;
-
.2 a clearly documented set of ship and voyage-specific
governance procedures, inter alia, covering procedures for the conduct
of exercises and real incidents;
-
.3 a documented list of duties, expected conduct,
behaviour and documentation of PCASP actions on board; and
-
.4 transparent two-way information flow and recognizable
coordination and cooperation between the shipowner, charterer, PCASP,
PMSC and the ship's master, officers and crew throughout deployment.
5.10 Factors to determine such success may include:
-
.1 providing regular updated intelligence-based
threat assessments throughout the contracted period on board, and
utilizing this information to offer suggestions as to the ship's proposed
routeing, amending same if required, and under the ship's contractual
arrangements;
-
.2 monitoring the daily activities of the onboard
PCASP team;
-
.3 having a 24-hour emergency response and a contingency
plan in place covering all foreseeable actions; and
-
.4 providing feedback on crew training and ship
hardening requirements based upon reports received from their onboard
PCASP team.