2 Equipment Classes
Clasification Society 2024 - Version 9.40
Statutory Documents - IMO Publications and Documents - Circulars - Maritime Safety Committee - MSC/Circular.645 – Guidelines for Vessels with Dynamic Positioning Systems – (Adopted on 6 June 1994) - Annex - Guidelines for Vessels with Dynamic Positioning Systems - 2 Equipment Classes

2 Equipment Classes

  2.1 A DP-system consists of components and systems acting together to achieve sufficiently reliable position keeping capability. The necessary reliability is determined by the consequence of a loss of position keeping capability. The larger the consequence, the more reliable the DP-system should be.

To achieve this philosophy the requirements have been grouped into three equipment classes. For each equipment class the associated worst case failure should be defined as in 2.2 below.

The equipment class of the vessel required for a particular operation should be agreed between the owner of the vessel and the customer based on a risk analysis of the consequence of a loss of position. Else, the Administration or coastal State may decide the equipment class for the particular operation.

  2.2 The equipment classes are defined by their worst case failure modes as follows:

  • .1 For equipment class 1, loss of position may occur in the event of a single fault.

  • .2 For equipment class 2, a loss of position is not to occur in the event of a single fault in any active component or system. Normally static components will not be considered to fail where adequate protection from damage is demonstrated, and reliability is to the satisfaction of the Administration. Single failure criteria include:

    • .1 Any active component or system (generators, thrusters, switchboards, remote controlled valves, etc.).

    • .2 Any normally static component (cables, pipes, manual valves, etc.) which is not properly documented with respect to protection and reliability.

    For equipment class 3, a single failure includes:

    • .1 Items listed above for class 2, and any normally static component is assumed to fail.

    • .2 All components in any one watertight compartment, from fire or flooding.

    • .3 All components in any one fire sub-division, from fire or flooding (for cables, see also 3.5.1).

  2.3 For equipment classes 2 and 3, a single inadvertent act should be considered as a single fault is such an act is reasonably probable.

  2.4 Based on the single failure definitions in 2.2 the worst case failure should be determined and used as the criterion for the consequence analysis (see 3.4.2.4).

  2.5 The Administration should assign the relevant equipment class to a DP-vessel based on the criteria in 2.2 and state it in the Flag State Verification and Acceptance Document (FSVAD) (see 5.2).

  2.6 When a DP-vessel is assigned an equipment class this means that the DP-vessel is suitable for all types of DP-operations within the assigned and lower equipment classes.

  2.7 It is a provision of the guidelines that the DP-vessel is operated in such a way that the worst case failure, as determined in 2.2, can occur at any time without causing a significant loss of position.


Copyright 2022 Clasifications Register Group Limited, International Maritime Organization, International Labour Organization or Maritime and Coastguard Agency. All rights reserved. Clasifications Register Group Limited, its affiliates and subsidiaries and their respective officers, employees or agents are, individually and collectively, referred to in this clause as 'Clasifications Register'. Clasifications Register assumes no responsibility and shall not be liable to any person for any loss, damage or expense caused by reliance on the information or advice in this document or howsoever provided, unless that person has signed a contract with the relevant Clasifications Register entity for the provision of this information or advice and in that case any responsibility or liability is exclusively on the terms and conditions set out in that contract.