2.1 Free-Fall Lifeboat Certification Issues
Clasification Society 2024 - Version 9.40
Statutory Documents - IMO Publications and Documents - Circulars - Maritime Safety Committee - MSC/Circular.616 – Evaluation of Free-Fall Lifeboat Launch Performance – (22 June 1993) - Annex – Evaluation of Free-Fall Lifeboat Launch Performance - Section 2 - 2.1 Free-Fall Lifeboat Certification Issues

2.1 Free-Fall Lifeboat Certification Issues

  2.1.1 Most of the prototype tests required for certification of free-fall lifeboats are the same as those required for conventional davit launched lifeboats, e.g., the speed and self-righting tests. Other tests, e.g., the free-fall tests, are peculiar to and only conducted with free-fall lifeboats. Through these special free-fall lifeboat tests, several considerations which are unique to such lifeboats can be verified. In general, these considerations are:

  • .1 The lifeboat must have adequate reserve strength. This is demonstrated during the overheight drop test .

  • . 2 The lifeboat must have adequate strength for repeated use. This is demonstrated during the free-fall tests .

  • . 3 The lifeboat must make positive headway after water entry. This is also demonstrated during the free-fall tests .

  • . 4 The occupants must be protected from injury during the free-fall and water entry. This is demonstrated through acceleration forces measured during the free-fall tests.

  2.1.2 Even though much can be learned about the performance of a free-fall lifeboat through use of models - the use of models to infer performance is definitely encouraged - there are some tests that can only be conducted with full-scale boats. It is not always economically feasible to conduct all these tests before the prototype certification trials are conducted. The free-fall tests are typical of such tests because special equipment and towers are often required for the evaluation. There will always be unknowns when a boat is tested the first time and failures may result. Such failures should not be interpreted negatively. They are not necessarily indicative of an inferior lifeboat or of carelessness on the part of a manufacturer. Often, more can be learned from a failure than from a success. Regardless, modifications can be made and the failed tests are usually successful the second time.

  2.1.3 Following is a brief discussion of the intent of the special free-fall lifeboat tests that are conducted and considerations during those tests. More thorough discussions about the behavior of free-fall lifeboats and the bases of methods used to evaluate that behavior are presented in other sections of this circular.


Copyright 2022 Clasifications Register Group Limited, International Maritime Organization, International Labour Organization or Maritime and Coastguard Agency. All rights reserved. Clasifications Register Group Limited, its affiliates and subsidiaries and their respective officers, employees or agents are, individually and collectively, referred to in this clause as 'Clasifications Register'. Clasifications Register assumes no responsibility and shall not be liable to any person for any loss, damage or expense caused by reliance on the information or advice in this document or howsoever provided, unless that person has signed a contract with the relevant Clasifications Register entity for the provision of this information or advice and in that case any responsibility or liability is exclusively on the terms and conditions set out in that contract.