1 The LRIT system, as an international operational
system, requires a formalized governance structure. There have been
and will be issues surrounding the operation of the LRIT system which
have and will require immediate decisions or actions in order to safeguard
the system. There are numerous issues that the system could face,
from when to disconnect an LRIT Data Centre (DC) from the International
LRIT Data Exchange (IDE), to how to test the modification testing
of new schemas, to whether a new message or function should be added
to the system, and so on. Some of these issues would require immediate
action, others more analysis, and still others a high-level management
decision.
2 To address these varying types of issues, four
different governance levels are defined, as follows:
-
.1 Immediate decision: The various components
of the LRIT system are being continuously monitored by their individual
operators. Under specific circumstances, the IDE, the LRIT Data Distribution
Plan (DDP) server and DCs operators must be required to make immediate
decisions in order to resolve the issue and stabilize the component
concerned.
-
.2 Operational governance: After the immediate
decision has been made, and if the system cannot be returned by the
operators to normal operation within 24 hours, then the LRIT Operational
governance body, as defined below, must be engaged to make the decision
as to the best way to proceed.
-
.3 Change control: The architecture, design, and
operation of the LRIT system is defined under the framework of SOLAS
regulation V/19-1, the Revised performance standards (resolution MSC.263(84),
as amended) and the Technical specifications for the LRIT system (MSC.1/Circ.1259
and MSC.1/Circ.1294, as revised). SOLAS regulation
V/19-1 and the Revised performance standards are within the
purview of the Committee. The Technical specifications for the LRIT
system can be amended and accepted, on a provisional basis, by the
NCSR Sub-Committee, and subject to consideration and adoption of the
related amendment(s) by the Committee.
-
.4 Management: The Maritime Safety Committee is
the management body for the entire LRIT system. Any relevant issue
must be reported periodically to the Committee, which would have to
consider the issue and decide the most appropriate action(s).
LRIT Operational governance body
3 The LRIT Operational governance body consists
of a representative of the IDE, a representative of the disaster recovery
site of the IDE and a representative from the IMO Secretariat.
4 In case the LRIT system faces an emergency situation
or a malicious attack, the LRIT Operational governance body should
determine the actions to be taken so as to best protect the system,
contain the propagation of the problem(s) to other components of the
system, ensure continuity of service and restore normal operations.
5 The LRIT Operational governance body may also
make relevant technical recommendations with the view to improving
the efficiency, effectiveness and security of the LRIT system. Any
relevant outcomes or recommendations made by the OGB should be reported
to the NCSR Sub-Committee through the Secretariat.
6 The composition of the LRIT Operational governance
body could be reviewed in future. For the effective and efficient
operation of this body, its membership needs to be relatively small,
organization members are preferable to individual persons, and it
must reach decisions by consensus. This body should always contain
a representative from the IDE and the IDE disaster recovery site,
since the IDE is a critical central component of the system, and a
representative from the Secretariat. The requirement for other member(s)
needs further discussion.
7 The LRIT Operational governance body also needs
to meet periodically (potentially bi-weekly via teleconference, if
necessary) to discuss the operation of the system and to ensure that
all operational issues are being addressed.