3 Oil Tankers
3.1 Specific design loading conditions
3.1.1 Seagoing conditions
The following seagoing loading conditions are to be included, as a minimum,
in the loading manual:
- a) Heavy ballast condition where the ballast tanks may be full,
partially full or empty. Where ballast tanks are partially full, the conditions
in [2.2.1] are to be complied with. The fore
peak water ballast tank is to be full, if fitted. If upper and lower fore peak
tanks are fitted, the lower is required to be full and the upper tank may be
full, partially full or empty. All the cargo tanks are to be empty including
cargo tanks suitable for the carriage of water ballast at sea. The draught at
the forward perpendicular is not to be less than that for the normal ballast
condition. The propeller is to be fully immersed. The trim is to be by the stern
and is not to exceed 0.015 LLL.
- b) Mid-voyage conditions relating to tank cleaning or other operations where
these differ significantly from the ballast conditions.
- c) Any specified non-uniform distribution of loading.
- d) Conditions with high density cargo including the maximum design cargo
density, when applicable.
- e) Design ballast condition in which all segregated ballast tanks in the cargo
tank region are full and all other tanks are empty including fuel oil and fresh
water tanks. This design condition is for assessment of hull strength and is not
intended for ship operation. This condition will also be covered by the IMO
73/78 SBT condition provided the corresponding condition in the loading manual
only includes ballast in segregated ballast tanks in the cargo tank
region.
3.1.2 Additional loading conditions
The following additional loading conditions are to be included in the loading manual if
the ship is specifically approved and intended to be operated in such conditions:
- a) Seagoing ballast conditions including water ballast carried in one or more
cargo tanks which are intended for use in emergency situations as allowed by
MARPOL Reg. 18.
- b) Seagoing loading conditions where the net static upward load on the double
bottom exceeds that given with the combination of an empty cargo tank and a mean
ship’s draught of 0.9 TSC.
- c) Seagoing loading conditions with cargo tanks less than 25% full with the
combination of mean ship’s draught greater than 0.9 TSC.
- d) Seagoing loading conditions where the net static downward load on the double
bottom exceeds that given with the combination of a full cargo tank at a cargo
density of 1.025 t/m3 or greater and a mean ship’s draught of 0.6
TSC.
- e) For ships arranged with cross ties in the centre cargo tank, seagoing
loading conditions showing a nonsymmetric loading pattern where the difference
in filling level between corresponding port and starboard wing cargo tanks
exceeds 25% of the filling height in the wing cargo tank.
3.2 Design load combinations for direct strength analysis
3.2.1 The design load combinations for FE analysis are given in Table 1 as
follows:
Table 1 : Design load combination for oil tankers
|
Midship cargo hold region
|
Outside midship cargo hold region
|
Foremost cargo tanks
|
Aftmost cargo tanks
|
Tankers with two oil-tight bulkheads
|
Table 2
|
Table 4
|
Table 6
|
Table 8
|
Tankers with one centreline oil-tight bulkhead
|
Table 3
|
Table 5
|
Table 7
|
Table 9
|
Note 1: Outside midship
cargo hold region means the forward or aft cargo hold region except the
foremost and aftmost cargo holds
|
3.2.2 For tankers with two oil-tight longitudinal bulkheads, where the cargo tank
length is less than 0.15 L, the draughts given in Table 2, Table 4, Table 6 and
Table 8 are subject to special consideration by the Society.
3.2.3 For tankers with one centreline oil-tight longitudinal bulkhead, where the
cargo tank length is less than 0.11 L, the draughts given in Table 3, Table 5,
Table 7 and Table 9 are subject to special consideration by the Society.
3.2.4 For seagoing conditions, the dynamic load cases required to be
investigated for each loading pattern are indicated in Table 2 to Table 9. Dynamic load
cases are defined in Ch 4, Sec 2.
3.2.5 Ships with structure symmetrical about centreline
For ships with structure symmetrical about the centreline, the loading pattern mirrored
about centreline of another pattern may be omitted provided the results (yield and
buckling) are mirrored, e.g. Table 2 A7b, A12b.
3.2.6 Tankers with two oil-tight longitudinal bulkheads except with a cross tie
arrangement in the wing cargo tanks
For tankers with two oil-tight longitudinal bulkheads except with a cross
tie arrangement in the wing cargo tanks, loading patterns A7 and A12 in Table 2, Table
4, Table 6 and Table 8 are to be examined for the possibility that unequal filling
levels in transversely paired wing cargo tanks would result in a more onerous stress
response. Loading pattern A7 is required to be analysed only if such a non-symmetric
seagoing loading condition is included in the ship loading manual. The actual loading
pattern, draught, GM and kr from the loading manual are to be
used in the FE analysis. Where the GM and kr are not given in
the ship’s loading manual, GM and kr are to be determined in
accordance with Ch 4, Sec 3.
If loading patterns A7 and A12 are not considered, an operational restriction describing
that the difference in filling level between corresponding port and starboard wing cargo
tanks is not to exceed 25% of the filling height in the wing cargo tank, is to be added
in the loading manual.
Loading patterns A7 and A12 need not be examined for tankers with a cross tie arrangement
in the wing cargo tanks.
3.2.7 For tankers with two oil-tight longitudinal bulkheads, seagoing loading
pattern A3 and harbour loading pattern A13, with all cargo tanks abreast empty, in Table
2, Table 4, Table 6 and Table 8 are to be analysed with a ship draught of 0.65
TSC and 0.7 TSC respectively. If conditions
in the ship loading manual specify greater draughts for loading pattern A3 or A13, then
the maximum specified draught in the ship’s loading manual for the loading pattern is to
be used.
3.2.8 For tankers with two oil-tight longitudinal bulkheads, seagoing loading
pattern A5 and harbour loading pattern A11, with all cargo tanks abreast fully loaded,
in Table 2, Table 4, Table 6 and Table 8 are to be analysed with a ship draught of 0.65
TSC and 0.6 TSC respectively. If conditions
in the ship loading manual specify lesser draughts for loading pattern A5 or A11, then
the minimum specified draught in the ship’s loading manual for the loading pattern is to
be used.
3.2.9 For loading patterns A1, A2, B1, B2 and B3, with cargo tank(s) empty, in
Table 2 to Table 9, a minimum ship draught of 0.9 TSC is to be used in
the analysis. If conditions in the ship loading manual specify greater draughts for
loading patterns with empty cargo tank(s), then the maximum specified draught for the
actual condition is to be used.
3.2.10 Ballast conditions
Where a ballast condition is specified in the ship loading manual with ballast water
filled in one or more cargo tanks, loading patterns A8 or B7 in Table 2 or Table 3 are
to be examined.
If the actual loading pattern as specified in the loading manual is different from load
pattern A8 or B7 then:
- a) The actual loading patterns are to be substituted for the loading pattern A8
or B7 with the following calculation conditions:
- Draught to be taken as TBAL-E,
- CBM-LC = 100% (sag.),
- CSF-LC = 100%,
- 100% filling of the considered tanks carrying ballast water.
- b) The strength assessment is to be carried out for all the dynamic
load cases as defined in Ch
4, Sec 2.
- c) An operational restriction corresponding to the analysed condition is to be
added in the loading manual.
The actual loading pattern, draught, GM and kr from the loading
manual are to be used in the FE analysis. Where the GM and kr
are not given in the ship’s loading manual, GM and kr are to be
determined in accordance with Ch 4, Sec 3.
Table 2 : Load combinations for FE analysis for two oil-tight bulkheads oil
tankers applicable to midship cargo hold region
Table 3 : Load combinations for FE analysis for one centreline oil-tight
bulkheads oil tankers applicable to midship cargo region
Table 4 : Load combinations for FE analysis for two oil-tight bulkheads oil
tankers applicable to outside midship cargo hold region
No.
|
Loading
pattern
|
Still water
loads
|
Dynamic load
cases
|
Draught
|
CBM-LC : % of perm.
SWBM
|
CSF-LC : % of perm. SWSF
|
Aft region
|
Forward region
|
Seagoing conditions
|
A1
|
|
0.9TSC
|
100% (sagging)
|
100%
|
HSM-1 BSP-1P/S,
|
HSM-1, BSP-1P/S,
|
100% (hogging)
|
100%
|
HSM-2, FSM-2 BSP-1P/S,
OST-2P/S, OSA-1P/S,
|
HSM-2,
FSM-2 BSP-1P/S,
|
A2
|
|
0.9TSC
|
100% (sagging)
|
100%
|
HSM-1 BSP-1P/S,
|
HSM-1, FSM-1 BSP-1P/S,
OSA-2P/S,
|
100% (hogging)
|
100%
|
HSM-2, FSM-2 BSP-1P/S,
|
HSM-2, BSP-1P/S,
|
A3
|
|
0.65TSC
|
100% (hogging)
|
100% Max SFLC
|
HSM-2
|
HSM-2 FSM-2
|
100%
|
BSP-1P/S,
|
BSP-1P/S, OSA-2P/S,
|
0%
|
100% Max SFLC
|
HSM-1
|
HSM-1
|
100%
|
N/A
|
BSP-1P/S, OSA-2P/S,
|
A4
|
|
0.6TSC
|
100% (sagging)
|
100%
|
HSM-1 BSP-1P/S,
BSR-1P/S,
|
HSM-1 BSP-1P/S,
BSR-1P/S, OSA-2P/S,
|
A5
|
|
0.65TSC
|
100% (sagging)
|
100% Max SFLC
|
HSM-1 FSM-1
|
HSM-1
|
100%
|
BSP-1P/S,
|
BSP-1P/S, OSA-2P/S
|
0%
|
100% Max SFLC
|
HSM-2
|
HSM-2
|
100%
|
BSP-1P/S,
|
BSP-1P/S, OSA-2P/S
|
A6
|
|
0.6TSC
|
100% (hogging)
|
100%
|
HSM-2 BSP-1P/S,
BSR-1P/S,
|
HSM-2, BSP-1P/S,
BSR-1P/S, OSA-2P/S,
|
A7a
|
|
TLC
|
100% (hogging)
|
100%
|
HSM-2, FSM-2 BSP-1P/S,
BSR-1P, BSR-2S OSA-1P/S,
OSA-2P/S, OST-2P
|
HSM-2, FSM-2 BSP-1P/S,
BSR-1P, BSR-2S OSA-2P/S,
|
A7b
|
|
TLC
|
100% (hogging)
|
100%
|
HSM-2, FSM-2 BSP-1P/S,
BSR-2P, BSR-1S OSA-1P/S,
OSA-2P/S, OST-2S
|
HSM-2, FSM-2 BSP-1P/S,
BSR-2P, BSR-1S OSA-2P/S,
|
Harbour and testing
conditions
|
A9
|
|
0.25TSC
|
100% (sagging)
|
100%
|
N/A
|
A10
|
|
0.25TSC
|
100% (sagging)
|
100%
|
N/A
|
A11
|
|
0.6TSC
|
100%
(sagging)
|
100% (2) Max SFLC
|
N/A
|
100% (3) Max SFLC
|
N/A
|
A12a (1)
|
|
0.33TSC
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
A12b (1)
|
|
0.33TSC
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
A13
|
|
0.7TSC
|
100% (hogging)
|
100% (2) Max SFLC
|
N/A
|
100% (3) Max SFLC
|
N/A
|
A14
|
|
TSC
|
100% (hogging)
|
100%
|
N/A
|
(1) The
actual shear force and bending moment that results from the application
of local loads to the FE model are to be used. Adjusting vertical loads
and bending moments are not applied. (2) The
shear force is to be adjusted to target value at aft bulkhead of the
mid-hold. (3) The shear force is to be adjusted
to target value at forward bulkhead of the mid-hold.
|
Table 5 : Load combinations for FE analysis for one centreline oil-tight
bulkheads oil tankers applicable to outside midship cargo hold
region
No.
|
Loading
pattern
|
Still water loads
|
Dynamic load cases
|
Draught
|
CBM-LC : % of perm. SWBM
|
CSF-LC : % of perm. SWSF
|
Aft region
|
Forward region
|
Seagoing
conditions
|
B1
|
|
0.9TSC
|
100% (sagging)
|
100%
|
HSM-1, FSM1 BSP-1P/S,
OSA-1S
|
HSM-1 BSP-1P/S,
OSA-2S
|
100% (hogging)
|
100%
|
HSM-2, FSM-2 BSP-1P/S,
OSA-1P OST-2P/S,
|
HSM-2, FSM-2 BSP-1P/S,
OSA-2S
|
B2
|
|
0.9TSC
|
100% (sagging)
|
100%
|
HSM-1, FSM-1 BSP-1P/S,
OSA-1P
|
HSM-1 BSP-1P/S,
OSA-2P
|
100% (hogging)
|
100%
|
HSM-2, FSM-2 BSP-1P/S,
OSA-1S OST-2P/S,
|
HSM-2, FSM-2 BSP-1P/S,
OSA-2P
|
B3
|
|
0.9TSC
|
100%
(hogging)
|
100% Max SFLC
|
HSM-2 FSM-2
|
HSM-2 FSM-2
|
100%
|
BSP-1P/S, BSR-1P/S,
|
BSR-1P/S,
|
0%
|
100% Max SFLC
|
HSM-1 FSM-1
|
HSM-1 FSM-1
|
100%
|
BSP-1P/S,
|
BSP-1P/S,
|
B4
|
|
0.6TSC
|
100% (sagging)
|
75%
|
HSM-1 BSR-1P/S,
|
HSM-1 BSP-1P/S,
OSA-2P/S,
|
B5
|
|
0.6TSC
|
100% (sagging)
|
75%
|
HSM-1 BSR-1P/S,
|
HSM-1 BSP-1P/S,
OSA-2P/S,
|
B6
|
|
0.6TSC
|
100%
(sagging)
|
100% Max SFLC
|
HSM-1 FSM-1
|
HSM-1 FSM-1
|
100%
|
OST-1P/S,
|
OSA-2P/S,
|
0%
|
100% Max SFLC
|
HSM-2 FSM-2
|
HSM-2 FSM-2
|
100%
|
OSA-2P/S,
|
OSA-2P/S,
|
Harbour and testing
conditions
|
B8
|
|
0.33TSC
|
100%
(sagging)
|
100% (1) Max SFLC
|
N/A
|
100% (2) Max SFLC
|
N/A
|
B9
|
|
0.33TSC
|
100% (sagging)
|
75%
|
N/A
|
B10
|
|
0.33TSC
|
100% (sagging)
|
75%
|
N/A
|
B11
|
|
TSC
|
100% (hogging)
|
100% (1) Max SFLC
|
N/A
|
100% (2) Max SFLC
|
N/A
|
(1) The
shear force is to be adjusted to target value at aft bulkhead of the
mid-hold. (2) The shear force is to be adjusted
to target value at forward bulkhead of the mid-hold.
|
Table 6 : Load combinations for FE analysis for two oil-tight bulkheads oil
tankers applicable for foremost cargo hold
No.
|
Loading
pattern
|
Still water loads
|
Dynamic load cases
|
Draught
|
CBM-LC : % of perm. SWBM
|
CSF-LC : % of perm. SWSF
|
Foremost cargo hold
|
Seagoing conditions
|
A1
|
|
0.9TSC
|
100% (sagging)
|
100%
|
HSM-1,
FSM-1 BSP-1P/S,BSR-1P/S OSA-2P/S,
OST-1P/S
|
A2
|
|
0.9TSC
|
100% (sagging)
|
100%
|
HSM-1, OSA-2P/S
|
A3-1
|
|
0.65TSC
|
100% (sagging)
|
100%
|
HSM-1, OSA-2P/S
|
A3-2 (1)
|
|
0.65TSC
|
0%
|
100% Max SFLC
|
HSM-2
|
100%
|
BSP-1P/S, OSA-2P/S
|
100% (sagging)
|
100% Max SFLC
|
HSM-1
|
100%
|
OSA-2P/S
|
A4 (1)
|
|
0.6TSC
|
50% (hogging)
|
100%
|
FSM-1, BSP-1P/S,
OSA-2P/S
|
A5
|
|
0.65TSC
|
0%
|
100% Max SFLC
|
HSM-1
|
100% (hogging)
|
100% Max SFLC
|
HSM-2
|
100%
|
BSP-1P/S
|
A6 (1)
|
|
0.6TSC
|
50% (hogging)
|
100%
|
OSA-2P/S
|
A7a
|
|
TLC
|
100% (sagging)
|
100%
|
HSM-1, HSA-1, FSM-1,
BSP-1P/S,
BSR-1P/S OST-1P/S, OSA-2P/S
|
A7b
|
|
TLC
|
100% (sagging)
|
100%
|
HSM-1, HSA-1, FSM-1,
BSP-1P/S,
BSR-1P/S OST-1P/S, OSA-2P/S
|
Harbourand testing
conditions
|
A9
|
|
0.25TSC
|
100% (hogging)
|
100%
|
N/A
|
A10
|
|
0.25TSC
|
100% (hogging)
|
100%
|
N/A
|
A11
|
|
0.6TSC
|
100% (hogging)
|
100% (2) Max SFLC
|
N/A
|
100% (3) Max SFLC
|
N/A
|
A12-a (1) (4)
|
|
0.33TSC
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
A12-b (1) (4)
|
|
0.33TSC
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
A13 (1)
|
|
0.7TSC
|
100% (sagging)
|
100% (2) Max SFLC
|
N/A
|
100% (3) Max SFLC
|
N/A
|
A14
|
|
TSC
|
100% (sagging)
|
100%
|
N/A
|
(1) 100%
filling of all fore peak water ballast tanks. (2)
The shear force is to be adjusted to target value at aft bulkhead of the
mid-hold. (3) The shear force is to be adjusted
to target value at forward bulkhead of the mid-hold.
(4) The actual shear force and bending moment
that results from the application of local loads to the FE model are to
be used. Adjusting vertical loads and bending moments are not
applied.
|
Table 7 : Load combination for FE analysis for one centreline oil-tight
bulkheads oil tankers applicable for foremost cargo hold
No.
|
Loading pattern
|
Still water loads
|
Dynamic load cases
|
Draught
|
CBM-LC : % of perm. SWBM
|
CSF-LC : % of perm. SWSF
|
Foremost cargo hold
|
Seagoing conditions
|
B1
|
|
0.9TSC
|
100% (sagging)
|
100%
|
HSM-1 BSP-1P/S
OSA-2P/S
|
B2
|
|
0.9TSC
|
100% (sagging)
|
100%
|
HSM-1 BSP-1P/S OSA-2P/S
|
B3-1
|
|
0.9TSC
|
100% (sagging)
|
100%
|
BSP-1S/P, OSA-2S/P,
HSM-1
|
B3-2 (1)
|
|
0.9TSC
|
0%
|
100% Max SFLC
|
HSM-2,
|
100%
|
BSP-1S/P, OSA-2S/P,
|
100%
(sagging)
|
100% Max SFLC
|
HSM-1, FMS-1
|
100%
|
BSP-1S/P, OST-1S/P,
OSA-2P/S
|
B4 (1)
|
|
0.6TSC
|
100% (hogging)
|
75%
|
BSP-1P/S, OSA-2P/S
|
B5 (1)
|
|
0.6TSC
|
100% (hogging)
|
75%
|
BSP-1P/S, OSA-2P/S
|
B6
|
|
0.6TSC
|
0%
|
100% Max SFLC
|
HSM-1
|
100%
|
OSA-2P/S
|
100%
(hogging)
|
100% Max SFLC
|
HSM-2, FSM-2,
|
100%
|
OSA-2P/S
|
Harbour and testing
conditions
|
B8
|
|
0.33TSC
|
100% (hogging)
|
100% (2) Max SFLC
|
N/A
|
100% (3) Max SFLC
|
N/A
|
B9 (1)
|
|
0.33TSC
|
100% (hogging)
|
75%
|
N/A
|
B10 (1)
|
|
0.33TSC
|
100% (hogging)
|
75%
|
N/A
|
B11-1
|
|
TSC
|
100% (sagging)
|
100%
|
N/A
|
B11-2 (1)
|
|
TSC
|
100% (sagging)
|
100% (2) Max SFLC
|
N/A
|
100% (3) Max SFLC
|
N/A
|
(1) 100%
filling of all fore end water ballast tanks. (2)
The shear force is to be adjusted to target value at aft bulkhead of the
mid-hold. (3) The shear force is to be adjusted
to target value at forward bulkhead of the mid-hold.
|
Table 8 : Load combinations for FE analysis for two oil-tight bulkheads oil
tankers applicable for aftmost cargo hold
No.
|
Loading
pattern
|
Still water
loads
|
Dynamic load cases
|
Draught
|
CBM-LC : % of perm. SWBM
|
CSF-LC : % of perm. SWSF
|
Aftmost cargo hold
|
Seagoing conditions
|
A1
|
|
0.9TSC
|
100% (sagging)
|
100%
|
FSM-1, HSM-1,
BSP-1P/S
|
100% (hogging)
|
100%
|
HSM-2, BSP-1P/S, BSR-1P/S
OSA-1P/S
|
A2
|
|
0.9TSC
|
100% (sagging)
|
100%
|
HSM-1, FSM-1 BSR-1P/S,
OST-1P/S
|
100% (hogging)
|
100%
|
HSM-2, FSM-1, FSM-2,
OSA-1P/S
|
A3-1 (1)
(2)
|
|
0.65TSC
|
100% (hogging)
|
100% Max SFLC
|
HSM-2 FSM-2
|
100% (sagging)
|
100% Max SFLC
|
HSM-1, FSM-1
|
100%
|
BSP-1P/S
|
A3-2 (1)
(3)
|
|
0.65TSC
|
100% (hogging)
|
100% Max SFLC
|
HSM-2
|
100%
|
BSP-1P/S, OSA-1P/S
|
100% (sagging)
|
100% Max SFLC
|
HSM-1,FSM-1
|
100%
|
BSP-1P/S, OST-1P/S
|
A4
|
|
0.6TSC
|
100% (sagging)
|
100%
|
HSM-1, BSP-1P/S
|
100% (hogging)
|
100%
|
HSM-2, FSM-1,
BSP-1P/S, OSA-1P/S, OSA-2P/S
|
A5-1 (2)
|
|
0.65TSC
|
0%
|
100% Max SFLC
|
HSM-1, HSM-2, FSM-1,
|
100% (hogging)
|
100% Max SFLC
|
HSM-2, FSM-1
|
100%
|
BSP-1P/S
|
A5-2 (3)
|
|
0.65TSC
|
0%
|
100% Max SFLC
|
HSM-1, HSM-2
|
100%
|
BSP-1P/S, BSR-1P/S
|
100% (hogging)
|
100% Max SFLC
|
HSM-2, FSM-2
|
A6
|
|
0.6TSC
|
100% (hogging)
|
100%
|
HSM-2, FSM-1, BSP-1P/S,
BSR-1P/S, OSA-1P/S
|
A7a
|
|
TLC
|
100% (hogging)
|
100%
|
HSM-2, FSM-1, BSP-1P/S,
BSR-1P/S, OSA-1P/S
|
A7b
|
|
TLC
|
100% (hogging)
|
100%
|
HSM-2, FSM-1, BSP- 1P/S,
BSR-1P/S, OSA-1P/S
|
Harbour and testing
conditions
|
A9
|
|
0.25TSC
|
100% (hogging)
|
100%
|
N/A
|
A10
|
|
0.25TSC
|
100% (hogging)
|
100%
|
N/A
|
A11-1 (2)
|
|
0.6TSC
|
100% (hogging)
|
100% (5) Max SFLC
|
N/A
|
A11-2
(3)
|
|
0.6TSC
|
100% (hogging)
|
100% (5) Max SFLC
|
N/A
|
100% (6) Max SFLC
|
N/A
|
A12a (4)
|
|
0.33TSC
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
A12b (4)
|
|
0.33TSC
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
A13-1 (1) (2)
|
|
0.7TSC
|
100% (hogging)
|
100% (5) Max SFLC
|
N/A
|
A13-2 (1)
(3)
|
|
0.7TSC
|
100% (hogging)
|
100% (5) Max SFLC
|
N/A
|
100% (6) Max SFLC
|
N/A
|
100% (sagging)
|
100% (5) Max SFLC
|
N/A
|
100% (6) Max SFLC
|
N/A
|
A14
|
|
TSC
|
100% (hogging)
|
100%
|
N/A
|
100% (sagging)
|
100%
|
N/A
|
(1) 100%
filling of fuel and water ballast tanks in engine room, with tank
boundaries at the forward engine room bulkhead.
(2) The required adjustment in shear force at
aft bulkhead of the considered hold is to be done at forward slop tank
bulkhead. (3) The required adjustment in shear
force at aft bulkhead of the considered hold is to be done at forward
machinery space bulkhead. (4) The actual shear
force and bending moment that results from the application of local
loads to the FE model are to be used. Adjusting vertical loads and
bending moments are not applied. (5) The shear
force is to be adjusted to target value at aft bulkhead of the mid-hold.
(6) The shear force is to be adjusted to
target value at forward bulkhead of the mid-hold.
|
Table 9 : Load combination for FE analysis for one centreline oil-tight
bulkheads oil tankers applicable for the aftmost cargo hold
No.
|
Loading pattern
|
Still water loads
|
Dynamic load cases
|
Draught
|
CBM-LC : % of perm. SWBM
|
CSF-LC : % of perm. SWSF
|
Aftmost cargo hold
|
Seagoing conditions
|
B1
|
|
0.9TSC
|
100% (sagging)
|
100%
|
HSM-1, FSM-1 BSP-1P/S,
BSR-1P/S
|
100% (hogging)
|
100%
|
HSM-2 BSP-1P/S,OSA-1P/S
|
B2
|
|
0.9TSC
|
100% (sagging)
|
100%
|
HSM-1, FSM-1 BSP-1P/S,
BSR-1P/S
|
100% (hogging)
|
100%
|
HSM-2 BSP-1P/S,
OSA-1P/S
|
B3-1 (1)
(2)
|
|
0.9TTC
|
100% (hogging)
|
100% Max SFLC
|
HSM-2
|
100%
|
BSP-1P/S
|
100% (sagging)
|
100% Max SFLC
|
HSM-1 FSM-1
|
100%
|
BSP-1P/S
|
B3-2 (1)
(3)
|
|
0.9TTC
|
100% (hogging)
|
100% Max SFLC
|
HSM-2, FSM-2
|
100%
|
BSP-1P/S, OSA-1P/S
|
100% (sagging)
|
100% Max SFLC
|
HSM-1 FSM-1
|
100%
|
BSP-1P/S
|
B4
|
|
0.6TSC
|
100% (hogging)
|
75%
|
HSM-2, BSP-1P/S,
OSA-1P/S
|
B5
|
|
0.6TSC
|
100% (hogging)
|
75%
|
HSM-2, BSP-1P/S,
OSA-1P/S
|
B6-1
(2)
|
|
0.6TSC
|
0%
|
100% Max SFLC
|
HSM-1
|
100% (hogging)
|
100% Max SFLC
|
HSM-2
|
B6-2
(3)
|
|
0.6TSC
|
0%
|
100% Max SFLC
|
HSM-1
|
100% (hogging)
|
100% Max SFLC
|
HSM-2
|
100%
|
HSA-2, BSR-1P/S,
|
Harbour and testing
conditions
|
B8-1 (2)
|
|
0.33TSC
|
100% (hogging)
|
100% (4) Max SFLC
|
N/A
|
B8-2
(3)
|
|
0.33TSC
|
100%
(hogging)
|
100% (4) Max SFLC
|
N/A
|
100% (5) Max SFLC
|
N/A
|
100%
(sagging)
|
100% (4) Max SFLC
|
N/A
|
100% (5) Max SFLC
|
N/A
|
B9
|
|
0.33TSC
|
100% (hogging)
|
75%
|
N/A
|
B10
|
|
0.33TSC
|
100% (hogging)
|
75%
|
N/A
|
B11-1 (1) (2)
|
|
TSC
|
100% (hogging)
|
100% (4) Max SFLC
|
N/A
|
100% (sagging)
|
100% (4) Max SFLC
|
N/A
|
B11-2 (1) (3)
|
|
TSC
|
100%
(hogging)
|
100% (4) Max SFLC
|
N/A
|
100% (5) Max SFLC
|
N/A
|
100%
(sagging)
|
100% (4) Max SFLC
|
N/A
|
100% (5) Max SFLC
|
N/A
|
(1) 100%
filling of fuel and water ballast tanks in engine room, with tank
boundaries at the forward engine room bulkhead.
(2) The required adjustment in shear force at
aft bulkhead of the considered hold is to be done at forward slop tank
bulkhead. (3) The required adjustment in shear
force at aft bulkhead of the considered hold is to be done at forward
machinery space bulkhead. (4) The shear force is
to be adjusted to target value at aft bulkhead of the mid-hold.
(5) The shear force is to be adjusted to
target value at forward bulkhead of the mid-hold.
|
|