7.1 Casualties to high-speed craft have illustrated
that there are number of navigational circumstances that need to be
taken into account when establishing the operating limitations under
the Permit to Operate. These include:
-
.1 adequacy of fixed aids to navigation on the
route;
-
.2 night vision with regard to unlit obstacles;
and
-
.3 other restricted visibility.
7.2 Administrations should note that paragraph
3.1.2 of annex 9 of the Code explicitly states that “worst
intended conditions, referred to in 1.4.57 of this Code, are those
in which it shall be possible to maintain safe cruise without exceptional
piloting skill. However, operations at all headings relative to the
wind and sea may not be possible”. This provision can
be taken into account by Administrations when setting operating limitations
in relation to the craft’s course-keeping and ability to follow
alternative courses in worsening weather and sea conditions.
7.3 Minimum safe water depth may relate to local
environmental regulations or hazards to other craft, persons and property
in the operational area in addition to navigational safety. For example,
Administrations may require investigation of wash waves generated
by the craft that are hazardous to nearby small craft and persons
on the shoreline, investigation of environmental hazards due to erosion,
and any restrictions on craft speed on the specific route in relation
to water depthfootnote in order to avoid
these hazards should be stipulated in the Permit to Operate.
7.4 Where a route is considered to be especially
vulnerable to grounding or stranding, Administrations may require
a risk assessment of these hazards, considering the applicability
of, for example:
-
.1 minimum safety margins around particular hazards
on the route;
-
.2 reduced speed during critical sections of the
route; or
-
.3 requiring two navigators in the operating compartment
during critical sections of the route.