Appendix 2 - Proof of the SO2/CO2 Ratio Method
Clasification Society 2024 - Version 9.40
Statutory Documents - IMO Publications and Documents - Resolutions - Marine Environment Protection Committee - Resolution MEPC.259(68) - 2015 Guidelines for Exhaust Gas Cleaning Systems - (Adopted on 15 May 2015) - Appendix 2 - Proof of the SO2/CO2 Ratio Method

Appendix 2 - Proof of the SO2/CO2 Ratio Method

1 The SO2/CO2 ratio method enables direct monitoring of exhaust gas emissions to verify compliance with emissions limits set out in table 1 in paragraph 1.3 of these guidelines. In the case of EGC systems that absorb CO2 during the exhaust gas cleaning process it is necessary to measure the CO2 prior to the cleaning process and use the CO2 concentration before cleaning with the SO2 concentration after cleaning. For conventional low alkali cleaning systems virtually no CO2 is absorbed during exhaust gas cleaning and therefore monitoring of both gases can be undertaken after the cleaning process.

2 Correspondence between the SO2/CO2 ratio can be determined by simple inspection of the respective carbon contents per unit mass of distillate and residual fuel. For this group of hydrocarbon fuels the carbon content as a percentage of mass remains closely similar, whereas the hydrogen content differs. Thus it can be concluded that for a given carbon consumption by combustion there will be a consumption of sulphur in proportion to the sulphur content of the fuel, or in other words a constant ratio between carbon and sulphur adjusted for the molecular weight of oxygen from combustion.

3 The first development of the SO2/CO2 ratio considered its use to verify compliance with emissions from 1.5% sulphur fuel. The limit of 65 (ppmfootnote/%) SO2/CO2 for 1.5% sulphur in fuel can be demonstrated by first calculating the mass ratio of fuel sulphur to fuel carbon, which is tabulated in table 1 in this appendix for various fuels and fuel sulphur contents; including 1.5% sulphur for both distillate and residual fuels. These ratios were used to solve for the corresponding SO2 and CO2 concentrations in exhaust, which are tabulated in table 2 of this appendix. Molecular weights (MW) were taken into account to convert mass fractions to mole fractions. For the 1.5% sulphur fuels in table 2, the amount of CO2 is set first at 8% and then changed to 0.5% to show that there is no effect due to changes in excess air. As expected, the absolute SO2 concentration changes, but the SO2/CO2 ratio does not. This indicates that the SO2/CO2 ratio is independent of fuel-to-air ratios. Therefore, SO2/CO2 ratio can be used robustly at any point of operation, including operation where no brake power is produced.

3.1 Note that the SO2/CO2 ratio varies slightly from distillate to residual fuel. This occurs because of the very different atomic hydrogen-to-carbon ratios (H:C) of the two fuels. Figure 1 illustrates the extent of the SO2/CO2 ratios' sensitivity to H:C over a broad range of H:C and fuel sulphur concentrations. From Figure 1, it can be concluded that for fuel sulphur levels less than 3.0% sulphur, the difference in S/C ratios for distillate and residual fuel is less than 5.0%.

3.2 In the case of using non-petroleum fuel oils, the appropriate SO2/CO2 ratio applicable to the values given in regulations 14.1 and/or 14.4 of MARPOL Annex VI will be subject to approval by the Administration.

Table 1: Fuel properties for marine distillate and residual fuel*

Carbon Hydrogen Sulphur Other C H S Fuel S/C Exh
SO2/CO2
Fuel Type %(m/m) %(m/m) %(m/m) %(m/m) mol/kg mol/kg mol/kg mol/mol ppm/%(v/v)
Distillate 86.20 13.60 0.17 0.03 71.8333 136 0.0531 0.00074 7.39559
Residual 86.10 10.90 2.70 0.30 71.7500 109 0.8438 0.01176 117.5958
Distillate 85.05 13.42 1.50 0.03 70.8750 134.2 0.4688 0.006614 66.1376
Residual 87.17 11.03 1.50 0.30 72.6417 110.3 0.4688 0.006453 64.5291

* Based on properties in the IMO NOx Monitoring Guidelines, resolution MEPC.103(49).

Table 2: Emissions calculations corresponding to 1.5 % fuel sulphur

CO2 SO2 Exh SO2/CO2 Exh S/C
% ppmfootnote ppmfootnote/% m/m
Distillate 0.17% S 8 59.1 7.4 0.00197
Residual 2.70% S 8 939.7 117.5 0.03136
Distillate 1.5% S 8 528.5 66.1 0.01764
Residual 1.5% S 8 515.7 64.5 0.01721
Distillate 1.5% S 0.5 33.0 66.1 0.01764
Residual 1.5% S 0.5 32.2 64.5 0.01721

SO2/CO2 ratio vs % sulphur in fuel

4 Correspondence between 65 (ppmfootnote/%) SO2/CO2 and 6.0 g/kWh is demonstrated by showing that their S/C ratios are similar. This requires the additional assumption of a brake-specified fuel consumption value of 200 g/kWh. This is an appropriate average for marine diesel engines. The calculation is as follows:

  • brake-specific SO2 = 6.0 g/kW-hr
  • MWS = 32.065 g/mol
  • MWSO2 = 64.064 g/mol
  • BSFC = 200 g/kW-hr
  • % carbon in 1.5% sulphur fuel (from table 1) = 85.05% (distillate) or 87.17% (residual)

Note 1: The S/C mass ratios calculated above, based on 6.0 g/kWh and 200 g/kWh BSFC, are both within 0.10% of the S/C mass ratios in the emissions table (Table 2). Therefore, 65 (ppmfootnote/%) SO2/CO2 corresponds well to 6.0 g/kWh.

Note 2: The value of 6.0 g/kWh, hence the 200g/kWh brake-specified fuel consumption is taken from MARPOL Annex VI as adopted by the 1997 MARPOL Conference.

5 Thus, the working formulas are as follows:

For complete combustion =

For incomplete combustion =

* Note: Gas concentrations must be sampled or converted to the same residual water content (e.g. fully wet, fully dry).

6 The following is the basis of using the (ppmfootnote/%) SO2/CO2 as the limit for determining compliance with regulation 14.1 or 14.4 of MARPOL Annex VI:
  • .1 This limit can be used to determine compliance from fuel oil burners that do not produce mechanical power.
  • .2 This limit can be used to determine compliance at any power output, including idle.
  • .3 This limit only requires two gas concentration measurements at one sampling location.
  • .4 There is no need to measure any engine parameters such as engine speed, engine torque, engine exhaust flow, or engine fuel flow.
  • .5 If both gas concentration measurements are made at the same residual water content in the sample (e.g., fully wet, fully dry), no dry-to-wet conversion factors are required in the calculation.
  • .6 This limit completely decouples the thermal efficiency of the fuel oil combustion unit from the EGC unit.
  • .7 No fuel properties need to be known.
  • .8 Because only two measurements are made at a single location, transient engine or EGCS unit effects can be minimized by aligning signals from just these two analysers. (Note that the most appropriate points to align are the points where each analyser responds to a step change in emissions at the sample probe by 50% of the steady-state value.)
  • .9 This limit is independent of the amount of exhaust gas dilution. Dilution may occur due to evaporation of water in an EGC unit, and as part of an exhaust sampler's preconditioning system.

Copyright 2022 Clasifications Register Group Limited, International Maritime Organization, International Labour Organization or Maritime and Coastguard Agency. All rights reserved. Clasifications Register Group Limited, its affiliates and subsidiaries and their respective officers, employees or agents are, individually and collectively, referred to in this clause as 'Clasifications Register'. Clasifications Register assumes no responsibility and shall not be liable to any person for any loss, damage or expense caused by reliance on the information or advice in this document or howsoever provided, unless that person has signed a contract with the relevant Clasifications Register entity for the provision of this information or advice and in that case any responsibility or liability is exclusively on the terms and conditions set out in that contract.