Section 4 Certification
Clasification Society 2024 - Version 9.40
Clasifications Register Guidance Information - Guidance Notes for Appraisal of Flexible Pipe Systems, September 2018 - Chapter 1 Appraisal of Flexible Pipe Systems - Section 4 Certification

Section 4 Certification

4.1 General

4.1.1 The purpose of certification is to undertake an agreed scope of review for confirming compliance of new construction, replacement, or repair assets, with standard(s) as specified by the company or manufacturer. The standard(s) may be stipulated by application-specific requirements, or established based on discussion and agreement with certification body (known as an IVA in API Specifications 17J and 17K). The scope of certification can be as narrow or as wide as the company or manufacturer specifies; as small as design or manufacture of one component or as wide as design and manufacture of an entire flexible pipe system. Exclusions from or additions to the design Codes or standards can be agreed by LR on a case-bycase basis.

4.2 Scope

4.2.1 The scope for certification for a flexible pipe system is to appraise its compliance with the specified standard(s) for design and/or manufacture for the flexible pipe and/or any ancillary equipment.

4.2.2 The main industry standards applicable for assurance of flexible pipe system are API Specification 17J (for unbonded flexible pipe), API Specification 17K (for bonded flexible pipe), and API Specification 17L1 for the associated ancillary equipment. Where certain performance criteria are not specifically covered by the abovementioned API specifications, other recognised standards may be applicable.

4.3 Overview

4.3.1 Certification can be performed for flexible pipes with or without TA certification. It should be recognised that use of a type approved flexible pipe product in a system does not automatically constitute certification of the flexible pipe or the system for a specific application (refer to Ch 1, 3.3 Limitations 3.3.1).

4.3.2 Certification assessment is performed through desktop review of design and/or physical surveillance of pipe body manufacture, end fittings manufacture, and assembly and manufacture of ancillary equipment.

4.3.3 A sampling approach is permitted for both desktop review and physical surveillance activities. The level of involvement and frequency of sampling requires professional judgement, depends on the criticality of the subject component, novelty of its application, degree of similarity in design, experience of designer, etc. and should be agreed with certification body at the outset, and if necessary, adjusted over the length of the certification process based on findings. If flaws are identified during the process, the company or manufacturer should be informed and an increased sample size and/or frequency should be agreed.

4.3.4 For certification of type approved flexible pipes where proposed ratings remain inside the envelope of existing type approved ratings, the process starts with a review of the product specification against the TA certificate and associated appendices to confirm the validity and limitations of TA certification and applicability of TA ratings to company specifications and conditions. Assessment should include design and manufacture aspects which are not covered by TA certification for the specified company requirements, i.e. functional, environmental, interference, accidental loads, design guidelines (refer to Ch 1, 3.4 General design 3.4.6), and Inspection and Test Plans (ITP).

4.3.5 For certification of type approved flexible pipes where proposed ratings fall outside the envelope of existing type approved ratings, the manufacturer should seek approval from the associated TA body well in advance of the certification process, and propose and conduct a qualification programme. The qualification programme should address any new technologies introduced in the product and any additional testing requirements. If applicable, PQA may be required by the TA body for new/modified manufacturing facilities. Upon approval of the new technologies by the TA body, a certificate from the TA body is then required as supporting evidence as part of the certification process.

4.4 Design assessment

4.4.1 Assessment of design is performed through desktop review of one or more of the following aspects, depending on the system setup and application.
  1. Static flowline:
    • The following aspects:
      • design basis;
      • material selection and fluid compatibility;
      • pressure containment;
      • cross-section design;
      • static stress analysis;
      • end fitting design;
      • crushing analysis;
      • dropped object and pipe impact resistance;
      • crazing analysis;
      • free span analysis;
      • crossing analysis;
      • service life assessment;
      • gas diffusion;
      • gas venting system;
      • slug flow analysis;
      • erosion analysis;
      • corrosion analysis and cathodic protection design;
      • fracture analysis;
      • on bottom stability;
      • as installed tie in analysis;
      • flange/hub interface;
      • hub connection clamp;
      • studs, nuts and gaskets;
      • installation head strength;
      • bend restrictor strength and corrosion;
      • concrete mattress impact resistance and stability; and
      • ITP including FAT and leak test.
    • For unbonded flexible pipe, bird-caging and in-place buckling analysis, gap span analysis and flow-induced pulsation analysis (FLIP) should also be considered.
    • For bonded flexible pipe, free span analysis should address fatigue due to VIV.
  2. Static riser
    • All aspects included in (a) static flowline, plus:
      • riser fatigue analysis and corrosion-fatigue for hanging section outside I-tube/J-tube;
      • hang-off assembly strength and corrosion; and
      • I-tube/J-tube seal system strength and corrosion.
    • For bonded flexible pipe, fatigue analysis should address fatigue due to VIV.
  3. Dynamic riser
    • All aspects included in (b) static riser, plus:
      • riser hydrodynamics;
      • fluid–structure interaction analysis;
      • riser global dynamic analysis;
      • clashing/interference analysis;
      • disconnect sequence and disconnected analysis;
      • hang-off latching mechanism (or diver-less bend stiffener connector) strength, fatigue and corrosion;
      • bend stiffeners strength, fatigue and corrosion;
      • ballast modules strength and corrosion;
      • buoyancy module strength and corrosion;
      • mid-water arch system strength and corrosion;
      • riser clamp strength and corrosion;
      • hold-down/hold-back tether system strength, fatigue and corrosion; and
      • pile/gravity anchor base strength, corrosion and stability.

4.4.2 For design certification of flexible pipes without a TA, assessment should also cover review of application-specific aspects of general design, described in Ch 1, 3.4 General design.

4.5 Manufacture assessment

4.5.1 Assessment of manufacture is performed through attendance during one or more of the following activities, making a number of random or agreed visits for surveillance and monitoring. Surveillance may be partial, at pre-agreed intervals, or if specified by company, a full-time attendance.
  • Manufacture of pipe body;
  • Manufacture of end fitting forged components;
  • Assembly of end fittings;
  • Manufacture of ancillary equipment; and
  • Flexible pipe FATs.

4.5.2 All metallic materials used in the manufacture, as a minimum, should have a 3.1 certificate according to EN 10204, and end fitting forged components should have a 3.2 certificate. When 3.2 certification does not cover machining, heat treatment, cladding, welding, etc., these should be inspected. When the flexible pipe system is intended for high-performance application (e.g. high pressure, ultra-deep water depth, supercritical CO2, highly sour service), all metallic materials used in the manufacture are recommended to have 3.2 certification. The procedure used by a third-party certifier for certification should be reviewed to ensure the certification is adequate.

4.5.3 Where deviation from product quality standards occurs during manufacture, the manufacturer should provide a NCR and photographic records to the TA body (if applicable) or certifier, with the proposed corrective action, accepted by purchaser, for assessment and approval of corrective actions. Records of approval should be reviewed for certification.

4.5.4 Repair during manufacture should be monitored and records reviewed to ensure that the process is carried out in accordance with the manufacturer's repair procedure.

4.5.5 For certification of flexible pipes without a TA, assessment of manufacture includes the requirements of Ch 1, 3.4 General design 3.4.5 and review of the following quality items:
  • ITP;
  • Material certificates; and
  • Repair records.

4.6 Deliverables

4.6.1 Deliverables should reflect the activities performed by the certification body based on the scope specified by company/manufacturer and agreed with the certification body.

4.6.2 Depending on the scope of certification the form of deliverable varies. Typical deliverables are as follows:
  • CRS or company/manufacturer preferred comment response system;
  • DAD;
  • Visit Report;
  • Inspection Release Note (IRN); and
  • Certificate.

Other forms of deliverables may be agreed and delivered based on client's requirements.


Copyright 2022 Clasifications Register Group Limited, International Maritime Organization, International Labour Organization or Maritime and Coastguard Agency. All rights reserved. Clasifications Register Group Limited, its affiliates and subsidiaries and their respective officers, employees or agents are, individually and collectively, referred to in this clause as 'Clasifications Register'. Clasifications Register assumes no responsibility and shall not be liable to any person for any loss, damage or expense caused by reliance on the information or advice in this document or howsoever provided, unless that person has signed a contract with the relevant Clasifications Register entity for the provision of this information or advice and in that case any responsibility or liability is exclusively on the terms and conditions set out in that contract.