Introduction
I The Polar Operational Limit Assessment Risk Indexing System (POLARIS) has been
developed incorporating experience and best practices from Canada's Arctic Ice Regime
Shipping System, the Russian Ice Certificate supplemented by pilot ice assistance as
prescribed in the Rules of Navigation on the water area of the Northern Sea Route and
other methodologies.
II The basis of POLARIS is an evaluation of the risks posed to the ship by ice conditions
in relation to the ship's assigned ice class. It uses the WMO nomenclature and the ice
class consistent with the ice class(es) referenced in the Polar Ship Certificate.
III POLARIS uses a Risk Index of Risk Values (RIVs) which are assigned to a ship based on
the ice class. The RIVs may be used to evaluate the limitations of the ship operating in
an ice regime using input either from historic or current ice charts for voyage planning
or in real time from the bridge of the ship.
IV The principal features of POLARIS are:
-
.1 the use of a combination of IACS Polar Class ice classes and ice classes
assigned equivalence to Finnish-Swedish Ice Class Rules under HELCOMfootnote, which are consistent with ice class references
used elsewhere in the Code;
-
.2 the use of ice type definitions generally consistent with WMO nomenclature and
which can be found on international ice charts;
-
.3 consideration of different ice regimes (e.g. waters with partial ice
concentrations of different ice types and development stages and ice free
waters);
-
.4 consideration of ice decay the outcome of which is a reduced risk due to a
reduction in ice strength for some ice types when operating in warmer ambient
temperatures; and
-
.5 an acknowledgement that ships operating under icebreaker escort have a
different risk profile to ships operating independently.
1 Polar Operational Limit Assessment Risk Indexing System (POLARIS)
1.1 Risk Index Values
1.1.1 Ships assigned an ice class and ships without an ice class have been assigned a
Risk Index in POLARIS. The Risk Index Values (RIVs) within the Risk Index are values
corresponding to a relative risk evaluation for corresponding ice types.
1.1.2 Ice types in POLARIS generally conform to WMO nomenclature used on ice charts with
the exception that Medium First Year Ice and Multi Year Ice are given two RIVs. Where
the operator can confidently determine that the Medium First Year Ice in a regime is
less than 1 metre in thickness, the RIVs in the column "Medium First Year Ice less than
1 m thick" may be used. Otherwise the RIVs in the column "Medium First Year Ice" should
be used. Similarly, where the operator can confidently determine that the Multi-Year Ice
in a regime is less than 2.5 metres in thickness, the RIVs in the column "Light
Multi-Year Ice" may be used. Otherwise the RIVs in the column "Heavy Multi-Year Ice"
should be used.
1.1.3 Risk Index values have been developed in tables 1.3 and 1.4. Table 1.4 reflects a
reduction in risk associated with decayed ice during times of higher ambient
temperatures for certain ice types. The standard Risk Index Values of table 1.3 should
be used unless ice decay is confirmed by ice information/visual observation by personnel
on board qualified in accordance with chapter 12 of the Polar Code. Only then may table
1.4 be used.
1.2 Risk Index Outcome
1.2.1 POLARIS uses a Risk Index Outcome (RIO) value to assess limitations for operation
in ice. Risk Index Values (RIVs) are assigned to the ship based on ice class and ice
types present according to tables 1.3 and 1.4. For each ice regime encountered, the Risk
Index Values are used to determine a RIO that forms the basis of the decision to operate
or the limitation of operations.
1.2.2 The RIO is determined by a summation of the RIVs for each ice type present in the
ice regime multiplied by its concentration (expressed in tenths):
1.3 Evaluation of the Risk Index Outcome for independent operations
1.3.1 Operational limitations for ships operating independently are determined based on
the criteria in table 1.1, using the calculated value of the RIO for the ice regime
encountered by the ship, given that due caution of the Mariner will be exercised, taking
into account such factors as changes in weather and visibility.
1.3.2 POLARIS addresses three levels of operation, normal operation, elevated operational
risk and operation subject to special consideration. For the purpose of POLARIS the RIO
values in table 1.1 equal these three levels of operation.
Table 1.1: Risk Index Outcome criteria
RIOSHIP
|
Ice classes
PC1-PC7
|
Ice classes below PC 7 and
ships not assigned an ice class
|
RIO ≥ 0
|
Normal operation
|
Normal operation
|
-10 ≤ RIO < 0
|
Elevated operational risk*
|
Operation subject to special consideration**
|
RIO < -10
|
Operation subject to special consideration**
|
Operation subject to special consideration**
|
* See section 1.4
** See section 1.5
1.4 Elevated Operational Risk
1.4.1 Ships operating in an elevated risk ice regime, based on the RIO outcome, should
limit the speed to the values indicated in table 1.2. Operational measures may also
include, provision of additional watch keeping or use of icebreaker support. When the
speed reduction may impair the ship manoeuvrability, the operation should be
avoided.
Table 1.2 Recommended speed limits for elevated risk operations
Ice Class
|
Recommended Speed Limit
|
PC1
|
11 knots
|
PC2
|
8 knots
|
PC3-PC5
|
5 knots
|
Below PC5
|
3 knots
|
1.4.2 Ships equipped with ice load measurement and monitoring systems can utilize these
systems to calibrate recommended speeds included in table 1.2.
1.4.3 Ships having undergone full scale ice trials and/or calculation-based methodologies
can utilize these results to calibrate recommended speeds included in table 1.2.
1.4.4 Recommended speed limits for elevated operational risk conditions should be
included in the Polar Water Operational Manual (PWOM).
1.4.5 For voyage planning generally, areas in which the potential to encounter elevated
risk operations has been identified should be avoided. Where elevated risk operations
are identified and included in a voyage plan, contingency plans should be in place and
documented in the PWOM.
1.5 Operations Subject to Special Consideration
1.5.1 Operations Subject to Special Consideration mean operations whereby extreme caution
should be exercised by the Master and officers in charge of a navigational watch when
navigating in ice.
1.5.2 Where a ship encounters an ice regime where the RIO identifies Operations Subject
to Special Consideration, suitable procedures should be contained in the PWOM and should
be followed. Such procedures should contain guidance to the operator on reducing the
increased risks present to the ship and should include course alteration/re-routing,
further reduction in speed and other special measures.
1.5.3 For voyage planning purposes, ice regimes where the RIO identifies Operations
Subject to Special Consideration should be avoided.
1.6 Risk Index Outcome for ships under icebreaker escort
1.6.1 In determining the RIO for a ship under icebreaker escort, the ice immediately
ahead of the ship should be considered as its ice regime. This regime should include
both the track of the icebreaker and, when the icebreaker has a smaller beam than the
escorted ship, any unmodified ice out to the maximum beam of the escorted ship.
1.6.2. The icebreaker itself should calculate its own RIO along the intended route.
1.6.3 In general, escorted operations should be reconsidered if the icebreaker encounters
a RIO below 0 or if the escorted ship is in an ice regime for which operation is subject
to special consideration.
1.6.4 For voyage planning purposes when icebreaker escort is intended to be used, the RIO
derived from non-escorted historical ice data may be assumed to be modified by adding 10
to its calculated value. However, it is cautioned that this is an average value which
can vary significantly. For actual operations, the RIO under escort should not be
modified and should be derived as described in the previous paragraphs.
1.7 Operations in ice regimes containing glacial ice
1.7.1 The presence of glacial ice represents additional risks to the ship. Areas
containing glacial ice should be approached with caution.
1.7.2 Appropriate training should be provided to the Master and officers in charge of a
navigational watch when navigating in ice on identification and avoidance of glacial ice
and the consequences of collision. Measures to avoid glacial ice should be documented in
the PWOM.
1.7.3 Where glacial ice is encountered, in addition to the RIO, a safe stand-off distance
should be observed by the ship. This stand-off distance should be recorded in the
PWOM.
Table 1.3 Risk Index Values
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PC1
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
PC2
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
PC3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
-1
|
PC4
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
-1
|
-2
|
PC5
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
-1
|
-2
|
-2
|
PC6
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
-1
|
-2
|
-3
|
-3
|
PC7
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
-1
|
-2
|
-3
|
-3
|
-3
|
IA Super
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
-1
|
-3
|
-3
|
-4
|
-4
|
IA
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
-1
|
-2
|
-3
|
-4
|
-5
|
-5
|
IB
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
-1
|
-2
|
-3
|
-4
|
-5
|
-6
|
-6
|
IC
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
-1
|
-2
|
-3
|
-4
|
-5
|
-6
|
-7
|
-8
|
Not Ice Strengthened
|
3
|
1
|
0
|
-1
|
-2
|
-3
|
-4
|
-5
|
-6
|
-7
|
-8
|
-8
|
Table 1.4 Risk Index Values decayed ice conditions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PC1
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
PC2
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
PC3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
-1
|
PC4
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
-1
|
-2
|
PC5
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
-1
|
-2
|
-2
|
PC6
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
-2
|
-3
|
-3
|
PC7
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
-1
|
-3
|
-3
|
-3
|
IA Super
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
-1
|
-3
|
-4
|
-4
|
IA
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
-1
|
-2
|
-4
|
-5
|
-5
|
IB
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
-1
|
-1
|
-2
|
-3
|
-5
|
-6
|
-6
|
IC
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
-1
|
-2
|
-2
|
-3
|
-4
|
-6
|
-7
|
-8
|
Not Ice Strengthened
|
3
|
1
|
0
|
-1
|
-2
|
-3
|
-3
|
-4
|
-5
|
-7
|
-8
|
-8
|