1.5 Under the provisions of SOLAS article I and chapter XI-2 and part
A of the ISPS Code, Contracting Governments are responsible
for promulgating laws and regulations and for taking other steps which
may be necessary to give SOLAS chapter XI-2 and part A of the ISPS Code full and complete
effect so as to ensure that, from the point of view of security, a
ship fully complies with the applicable requirements.
1.6 SOLAS regulation
XI-2/9 describes the control and compliance measures applicable
to ships to which SOLAS chapter XI-2 applies.
It is divided into three distinct sections: control of ships already
in port; control of ships intending to enter a port of another Contracting
Government; and additional provisions applicable to both situations
(ISPS Code paragraph B/4.29).
1.7 SOLAS regulation
XI-2/9.1, on control of ships in port, implements a system
for the control of ships while in the port of another Contracting
Government where duly authorized officers of that Contracting Government,
have the right to go on board the ship to verify that the required
International Ship Security Certificate (ISSC) or an Interim International
Ship Security Certificate (Interim ISSC) is in proper order. Then,
if there are clear grounds to believe the ship does not comply with
the relevant regulations, control measures such as additional inspections
or detention may be taken. This system corresponds to the port State
control inspections envisaged in SOLAS regulation
I/19. SOLAS regulation XI-2/9.1 builds
on these provisions and allows for additional measures (including
expulsion of a ship from a port to be taken as a control measure)
when duly authorized officers have clear grounds for believing that
a ship is in non-compliance with the requirements of SOLAS chapter XI-2 or part
A of the ISPS Code. SOLAS regulation
XI-2/9.3 describes the safeguards that promote fair and proportionate
implementation of these additional measures (ISPS
Code paragraph B/4.30).
1.8 SOLAS regulation
XI-2/9.2 applies control measures to ensure compliance for
ships intending to enter a port of another Contracting Government
and introduces an entirely different concept of control within SOLAS chapter XI-2, applying to security only,
available to a port State. Under this regulation measures may be implemented
prior to the ship entering port, to better ensure security. Just as
in SOLAS regulation XI-2/9.1, this
additional control system is based on the concept of clear grounds
for believing the ship does not comply with SOLAS chapter XI-2 or part
A of the ISPS Code, and includes safeguards in SOLAS regulation XI-2/9.2.2 and XI-2/9.2.5 as
well as in SOLAS regulation XI-2/9.3 (ISPS Code paragraph B/4.31).
1.9 The international law implications of SOLAS regulation XI-2/9 are particularly relevant,
and the regulation should be implemented with SOLAS regulation XI-2/2.4 in mind, as the potential
exists for situations where either measures will be taken which fall
outside the scope of SOLAS chapter XI-2,
or where rights of affected ships, outside SOLAS chapter XI-2, should be considered. Thus,
SOLAS regulation XI-2/9 does not
prejudice the Contracting Government from taking measures having a
basis in, and consistent with, international law to ensure the safety
or security of persons, ships, port facilities and other property
in cases where the ship, although in compliance with SOLAS chapter XI-2 and part
A of the ISPS Code, is still considered to present a security
risk (ISPS Code paragraph B/4.34).
1.10 The establishment of clear grounds for the
application of control measures is based not only on the ship itself
but also on interactions with port facilities or with other ships.
A ship otherwise compliant with SOLAS chapter
XI-2 and part A of the ISPS
Code may be subject to appropriate control measures if that ship had
interactions with a non-compliant port facility or ship. In deciding
whether to impose control measures in such cases, consideration should
be given to any special or additional security measures the ship implemented
and maintained during the interaction with the non-compliant port
facility or ship to minimize the risk of a security incident (ISPS Code paragraph B/4.33.6).
1.11 It is also possible that, at any time, reliable
information may be received concerning a ship in port which establishes
clear grounds and results in control measures been immediately applied
to the ship without undertaking an inspection of the ship.
1.12 It should be noted that many of the provisions
of part A of the ISPS Code require
that the guidance given in part B of
the ISPS Code, albeit recommendatory, be taken into account. It should
also be noted that part B of the ISPS
Code is a process that all parties concerned need to go through in
order to comply with part A of the
ISPS Code. For example, section A/9.4 of the ISPS
Code requires that in order for an ISSC to be issued, paragraphs
B/8.1 to B/13.8 of the ISPS Code need to have
been taken into account (MSC/Circ.1097).
1.13 When a Contracting Government imposes control
measures on a ship, the Administration should, without delay, be contacted
with sufficient information to enable the Administration to fully
liaise with the Contracting Government (ISPS Code paragraph
B/4.35).
1.14 This Guidance addresses the following aspects
of the control and compliance measures:
-
.1 training and qualification of duly authorized
officers;
-
.2 ships intending to enter a port of another
Contracting Government;
-
.3 control of ships in port;
-
.4 more detailed inspection where clear grounds
exist;
-
.5 safeguards; and
-
.6 reporting.