2.6 Special considerations
for column stabilized units
2.6.1
-
.1 Unless deck structures are designed for wave
impact, a clearance acceptable to the Administration should be maintained
between passing wave crests and the deck structure. The Administration
should be provided with model test data, past operating experience
with similar configurations or calculations showing that adequate
provision is made to maintain this clearance.
-
.2 For units operating while supported by the
sea-bed the clearance required in 2.5.1.2 should be maintained.
2.6.2
-
.1 The scantlings of the upper structure should
not be less than those required for the loadings shown in the deck
loading plan.
-
.2 When an approved mode of operation or damaged
condition in accordance with the stability requirements allows the
upper structure to become waterborne, special consideration should
be given to the resulting structural loadings.
2.6.3
-
.1 The scantlings of columns, lower hulls and
footings should be based on the evaluation of hydrostatic pressure
loadings and combined loadings including wave and current considerations.
-
.2 Where a column, lower hull or footing is a
part of the overall structural frame of a unit, consideration should
also be given to stresses resulting from deflections due to the applicable
combined loadings.
-
.3 Particular consideration should be given to
structural arrangements and details in areas subject to high local
loadings resulting from, for example, external damage, wave impact,
partially filled tanks or bottom bearing operations.
-
.4 When a unit is designed for operations while
supported by the sea-bed, the footings should be designed to withstand
the shock of bottom contact due to wave action on the hull. Such units
shouId also be evaluated for the effects of possible scouring action
(loss of bottom support). The effect of skirt plates, where provided,
should be given special consideration.
-
.5 The structure in way of components for the
position mooring system such as fairleads and winches should be designed
to withstand the stresses imposed when a mooring line is loaded to
its breaking strength.
2.6.4
-
.1 Bracing members should be designed to make
the structure effective against applicable combined loadings, and
when the unit is supported by the sea-bed, against the possibility
of uneven bottom bearing loadings. Bracing members should also be
investigated, where applicable, for combined stresses including local
bending stresses due to buoyancy, wave forces and current forces.
-
.2 Where applicable, consideration should be given
to local stresses caused by wave impact.
-
.3 Where bracings are watertight they should be
designed to prevent collapse from hydrostatic pressure.
-
.4 Consideration should be given to the need for
ring frames to maintain stiffness and shape in tubular bracing members.
|
Copyright 2022 Clasifications Register Group Limited, International Maritime Organization, International Labour Organization or Maritime
and Coastguard Agency. All rights reserved. Clasifications Register Group Limited, its affiliates and subsidiaries and their respective
officers, employees or agents are, individually and collectively, referred to in this clause as 'Clasifications Register'. Clasifications
Register assumes no responsibility and shall not be liable to any person for any loss, damage or expense caused by reliance
on the information or advice in this document or howsoever provided, unless that person has signed a contract with the relevant
Clasifications Register entity for the provision of this information or advice and in that case any responsibility or liability is
exclusively on the terms and conditions set out in that contract.
|
 |
|