2 The Committee considered the security measures
and procedures to be applied during ship/port interface when either
the ship or the port facility do not comply with the requirements
of chapter XI-2 and of the ISPS Code.
3 The Committee recalled paragraph B/9.51 of the ISPS Code which recommends that the ship security
plan (SSP) should establish details of the procedures and security
measures the ship should apply when:
-
.1 it is at a port of a State which is not a Contracting
Government;
-
.2 it is interfacing with a ship to which the
ISPS Code does not applyfootnote;
-
.3 it is interfacing with a fixed or floating
platform or a mobile drilling unit on location; or
-
.4 it is interfacing with a port or port facility
which is not required to comply with chapter
XI-2 and part A of the ISPS
Code;
and thus considers that guidance, in this respect, is only required
for those ships which have not already included appropriate provisions
to this end in the approved SSP.
4 The Committee decided to recommend that in such
cases, if the ship's approved SSP does not already include provisions
as recommended in paragraph B/9.51 of the ISPS Code,
the ship should attempt to conclude, if possible, a Declaration of
Security or to take the following action:
-
.1 record the actions taken by the Company Security
Officer (CSO) and/or Ship Security Officer (SSO) to establish contact
with the Port Facility Security Officer (PFSO), and/or any other persons
responsible for the security of the port, ship or platform being interfaced;
-
.2 record the security measures and procedures
put in place by the ship, bearing in mind the security level set by
the Administration and any other available security-related information;
and complete and sign, on behalf of the ship alone, a Declaration
of Security;
-
.3 implement and maintain the security measures
and procedures set out in the Declaration of Security throughout the
duration of the interface;
-
.4 report the actions taken to the CSO and through
the CSO to the Administration; and
-
.5 request the CSO to inform the authorities responsible
for the exercise of control and compliance measures (regulation XI-2/9) and the PFSO(s) at the
next port(s) of call of the difficulties the ship experienced and
of the actions the ship itself took.
5 The Committee recognized that a ship should
be able to address most of the ship security activities required by
section A/7 of the ISPS Code.
6 In addition the Committee recognized that on
certain occasions and, in particular, when a ship is required to call
at a port of a State which is not a Contracting Government, the ship
may be unable to identify the person responsible for the security
of that port or to conclude with such a person a Declaration of Security.